Health insurers have long forced patients to skip frustrating administrative steps to get the care they need — but more recently, their typically complex tactics have evolved into abuses that threaten patients’ health and well-being. When Covid-19 cases surged again frustratingly, President Joe Biden directed commercial insurers to reimburse consumers for rapid home tests—given the price of those tests and their usefulness to protect ourselves and each other.
However, despite the clarity of the guidelines, some insurers have already It’s almost impossible for Americans to complete the reimbursement process. By forcing consumers to print and fax lengthy, confusing forms, insurers are disincentivizing people to buy tests. Unfortunately, these perverse insurance tactics also threaten a key pillar of the national strategy to prevent infection and reduce the burden on hospitals.
Americans struggling to get insurance reimbursement for at-home Covid-19 tests are now joining a larger group of patients and doctors who experience this frustrating bureaucracy every day in nearly every field of medicine. Insurers are increasingly overriding doctors’ medical expertise by enacting policies that delay — and in some cases, deny — medically necessary care.This care rationing occurs simultaneously Increased patient out-of-pocket costs, including higher premiums and deductibles.
In short, patients are paying more and getting less.
Even before the latest Covid-19 test failed, insurers had put in place a series of aggravating hurdles aimed at preventing patients and doctors from competing with companies for coverage. For example, prior authorization is a popular insurance practice that allows insurance companies to delay or deny treatment and services prescribed by a patient’s doctor. By challenging doctors to develop treatments to meet patients’ unique clinical needs, insurers hope to delay paying for necessary procedures.according to American Medical Association94% of physicians reported delays in care due to prior authorization, and 30% said prior authorization caused patients to experience serious adverse events in their care.
Numerous examples of misuse of previous authorizations can be found without long searches. In January, a seasoned healthcare reporter Documented his frustrating experience to make sure he was on insulin for over 10 years. With only a 17-day supply of the life-saving drug, Bram Sable-Smith was suddenly hit with a prior authorization requirement that prevented his doctors and pharmacists from submitting their next prescription. After 20 phone calls himself — not to mention the efforts of his care team — he finally got approval from his insurance company just hours before his insulin supply was about to run out. For a seasoned journalist who knows our super-complex healthcare system very well, the process is almost impossible to handle. What should ordinary patients do?
Prior authorization was conceived to reduce expensive, experimental and unnecessary treatments and procedures. However, the largest U.S. insurers are increasingly using prior authorization to delay or deny routine and medically necessary care.For example, Aetna started requiring prior authorization all Cataract Surgery – One of the The most common and most effective All medical procedures for July 2021. therefore, Thousands of patients see their surgeries cancelled or postponedEven cataracts increase the risk of decline, car accidentand, as a recently published study highlights, DementiaAetna declined to provide any data to justify this rationed care, according to the ophthalmologist.
Misuse of prior authorization by insurers is creating health risks for patients and increasing downstream costs for beneficiaries and the larger healthcare system.
Fortunately, these concerns are shared by a bipartisan group of lawmakers in Congress — who are working to rein in the worst insurance abuses.this Improving Timely Access to Care for Seniors Act (HR3173 / S.3018) is a popular bill gaining support in Washington. It will protect the nation’s seniors from needlessly delaying or denying their care by simplifying the prior authorization process and holding insurance companies accountable for disruptions and delays. While the legislation applies only to Medicare Advantage (MA) plans, it represents an important first step in combating insurers’ overreach.and MA enrollment increasesand Aetna’s parent company, CVS Health possible In order to “prioritize our high-growth markets,” like Medicare Advantage, it makes sense for Congress to draw the line here first.
What’s the point of paying monthly health insurance premiums to protect yourself when the company that charges you is denying you a critical procedure or treatment you need? For patients around the world, I urge Congress to pass the Improving Timely Access to Care for Seniors Act to reassure more Americans that they are getting the health care they need and that they are getting their money’s worth.
Photo: Piotrekswat, Getty Images
