In recent days, the controversy surrounding the proposal to sell LV= to Bain Capital has intensified.
Here are what is happening and what it means for members:
– What is the history of LV=’?
LV=’ has about 1.2 million members and its history can be traced back to 178 years ago when it helped people living in poverty to afford funerals.
Members hold a variety of products, including investment and retirement income products.
Last year, it announced a proposal by Bain Capital to acquire LV=’s life and pension business.
– What is the background of Bain Capital?
Bain Capital Corporation of the United States was established in 1984, manages approximately 110 billion pounds of assets, and has offices around the world.
-Why propose changes?
LV= said that the highly competitive life and pension markets are driven by large insurance companies that have access to capital.
It says that a lot of investment is needed to effectively compete, especially in the context of rapid changes in technology and digital services that customers expect today.
As a mutual company, it stated that it has limited access to financial markets and the amount of debt it can raise is also limited.
– LV= How can members benefit?
Eligible members will receive a payment of £100, while eligible “profitable” members with long-term investment products will receive higher payments.
LV= believes that if it uses internal capital to fund its growth ambitions, most members holding eligible profitable policies will be less likely to benefit, because their policies expire before LV= sees investment returns NS. According to the proposal, Bain Capital will fund the investment with a transaction of 530 million pounds.
– Why choose Bain Capital?
According to LV=, the board of directors conducted a thorough review, including more potential “as is” and closure of new business.
It said that the Bain Capital transaction was determined to benefit all LV= members.
Qualified voting members will be able to comment on the proposal.
– How did the members of LV=’s react?
Some people believe that the potential loss of LV=’s mutual status will be a kind of “betrayal.” There are also calls to provide members with more information about the transaction.
petition Change.org As of Thursday, “Stop the demutualization of LV=” has attracted hundreds of signatures.
The comments at the bottom of the petition include: “LV = hold my pension. I bought from them because I want an ethical company, and the profits are not owned by shareholders. For the members who make this choice, shareholding It’s a betrayal.”
– Who else has expressed concern?
Write on thursday Daily mail Lord Heseltine described LV= as “a U.K The agency was known for most of its long life Liverpool Victoria Mutual Aid Society”.
He wrote: “I firmly believe that it should not be sold.”
Shadow business secretary Ed Miliband Also expressed concern.



