A former professor from Sydney, Australia was recently found guilty of sending a false threat letter to himself in 2019. As part of this plan, protector It was also reported that the woman, Dianne Jolley, “tipped her clothes to pieces and sent her underwear.” She will be sentenced at a later date.
According to reports, Qiao Li received her first letter on July 31, 2019. news siteAt that time, Jolley was a professor at the University of Technology Sydney, so the school invested $127,000 in security measures to ensure her safety. The money was used to install CCTV cameras in her home and office, as well as the personal bodyguards who escorted her to and from get off work.
One of the letters obtained by the Australian media said: “Cut off our future, we cut off your future.”
Another reading: “I look at you, I see what you do, your [sic] Not safe, you know. “
Michał Chodyra / iStock
Jolley also claimed that some of her belongings were stolen, including a pair of underwear that was later mailed to her. However, her fingerprints were later found on the stamp on the envelope.
Both publications stated that Jolly tried to terminate the university’s Chinese medicine course.according to protectorThe defense argued that these letters were sent by angry community members, and this series of letters was used to try to gain sympathy from science teachers.
Prosecutors claimed that Jolly closed one of the most “economically infeasible courses” for faculty members, with a view to “a performance-based reward of $40,000.”
After three days of deliberation, the jury found Jolley guilty of ten counts of conveying information that might cause a person to worry about his safety, and one count of causing economic disadvantage through possession.
Both media said that after being captured by CCTV in 2019, Qiao Li did plead guilty to sending a letter.
She said, “This series of real threatening letters has caused damage to her life and family. She is trying to find a way to be fired.” However, throughout the trial, she insisted that she did not send other series of letters. .
But the prosecutor claimed that the fingerprints found on the stamps of the letters containing the underwear were evidence that she sent all the underwear.
