Numbers, numbers. Which ones are correct? Except for the surface passes discovered by the Arizona audit, don’t count on traditional media. The Arizona Senate hearing on July 15th will give us an idea of what to expect from the final audit report, but this is almost the only story repeated by the Democratic media complex. This is an Just a day later, the Associated Press magically produced it:
Arizona county election officials found less than 200 potential voter fraud cases out of more than 3 million votes cast in the presidential election last year, which further proves the credibility of former President Donald Trump’s claims about election theft Because his allies continue to conduct controversial ballot reviews in the state. The most populous county.
In other words, don’t mind the devastating testimony given in the Senate hearing; “only 200 cases were found” (which means the audit is a waste of time). Associated Press(“A sort ofJerkphosphorusrop”) used to be Perform tasks hereThey are part of the Democratic Party’s political machinery, and unless the goal is to understand the latest false narratives of the Democratic Party, they should be ignored.
Let’s look at the real numbers, because the 200 number is a blatant lie-the Associated Press knows this.The following are some of the digital highlights from the Arizona Senate hearing on July 15 (excerpted from Listening video is here, Starting from the 3 hour 1 minute mark):
- 11,326 people who voted are not on the 11/7 voter roll, but are listed in the 12/4 database in some way
- 3,981 people who voted on election day registered after 10/15, which violated Arizona law
- Approximately 18,000 people voted on election day but were subsequently removed from the list
- 74,243 mailed ballots were counted and there was no clear mailing record.
Cyber “. ABC15, KNXV-TV, in Phoenix, he wrote on Twitter on July 16th:
Data incoming.
This #azaudit It is claimed that 74k voters “returned” an early ballot but did not “send” one.
The exact number is 74,241
After 10/26, all but 29 votes were cast. The county stopped sending “sent” files on October 23.
Early individual voters after 10/23.
Ruling: wrong. pic.twitter.com/67eb8RgaNQ
— AZ — abc15 — Data Master (@Garrett_Archer) July 16, 2021
By the way, please note that CNN uses the ever-present word “baseless(ly)” in their article The resounding “fact check” headline: “Fact check: The Arizona Auditor has baselessly questioned 74,000 votes.” Traditional media used “unfounded” in every propaganda report they generated about evidence of election fraud related to the 2020 election.
Fearless Retirement Senior Defense Department Analysis Ray Blehar took Garrett Archer and CNN to the wooden shed By making the following points:
- CNN’s “expert source” Garrett Archer did not provide his data; he claimed that the file was provided by “some of my friends”
- When asked to cite the documents he used, Archer claimed to have used EV32 (request ballot) and EV33 (return ballot) documents. However, Maricopa County election officials stated that the “voting documents” were the correct source for the analysis. In short, Archer used the wrong file!
- Without access to the actual server logs, it is impossible to determine whether the voting files are completely safe since election day. “[I]If the voting file is not secure, individuals can access it immediately after the network ninja announces the voting differences and changes the number. “
- Blehar further explained the importance of accessing server logs: “[T]Cyber ninja wants to know Especially if there is a one-to-one match between the absentee/early ballot it checks, and if there is a request for that ballot In the voting file. The total number of votes requested and returned-Maricopa County cited in its response to Logan-did not answer this question. ” [Note: Archer blithely ignored that key fact in his “analysis”!]
- In the days before and after the election, there should be data on returned ballots and requested ballots every day, but Maricopa County has never provided any of these numbers to the public. [Why?]
- “Arizona has never publicly released the ballots required and returned by each county in the state through its contractor dataorbital.com.” [Again, why?] One possible answer: This data can be used to allocate excess votes from Maricopa County.As mentioned before in the textOn the night of Election Day in Maricopa, Biden had about 120,000 more votes than his final form. These extra votes will almost certainly be distributed to other counties. The router logs must be checked to determine what happened, which may be one of the reasons Maricopa County refused to provide them to the auditor.One of the other reasons is 37,000 queries to the election system on March 11. [Why?]
in a Follow-up analysis of the Arizona election is here, Blehar explained how the electronic voting transfer of approximately 120,000 ballots in Maricopa County might occur:
- To make it work, one or more bad actors will visit Arizona voting files to determine how many votes there are Not vote Voting ends on November 3. Once… the total number of eligible non-voters in each county [was determined], A smaller number of Biden ballots can be transferred to the county electronically in the election management system.After that, voters will be designated as [having] Vote in the voting file.
- Canvassing votes will not find errors, because the county compares the number of votes (total from the voting book) with the total number of votes. Watch strap To make sure they match. The bad guys will manipulate these numbers to match them and know which areas and counties are clean and which are not.
This is why Maricopa County will not release router and server logs to auditors! This redundant vote distribution plan will be completely exposed.
Sorry, Garrett Archer, CNN and the Associated Press! Your false story is nothing but Democratic Party propaganda. If you really believe in your tripe, you will publicly pressure Maricopa County to provide server logs and routers for forensic analysis, which will ultimately prove your claim. Instead, you are eager to use non-authoritative sources to refute the audit results and tell us that you know that you lied on more than 74,000 absentee ballots and what your agenda is: you are part of the Democratic Party’s protection racket, which is today’s traditional media.
end.
