As the U.S. forces withdrew, the religious extremist terrorist organization known as the Taliban occupied nearly 60% of Afghanistan’s territory, but the Democratic Party seemed to only care about this. This is how the Taliban hopes to be seen by other countries. world.
At the White House press conference, press secretary Jen Psaki began to talk about the progress made by the Taliban in Afghanistan and gave up the gem.
“The Taliban must also assess what role they want to play in the international community,” she said.
.@PressSec: “The Taliban must also assess the role they want to play in the international community.”
pic.twitter.com/UNzTltdrce-Daily Caller (@DailyCaller) August 11, 2021
This is an interesting fact: they have determined how the international community views them, and the choice they have determined is “terrorism.” This was done decades and decades ago because they publicly suppressed women, killed political dissidents, massacred homosexuals, and killed thousands of innocent people.
This is that group Carried out more than ten slaughter campaigns Among them, women were raped and citizens were brutally tortured.they are Big to sex trade And they will be violent to anyone who is not them, including aid workers.
They are stubborn, racist, sexist, religious extremists, and they really don’t care what the international community thinks of them. If they acted their way, they would slaughter the international community and enslave anyone they did not kill. Terrorists are terrorists. End of the story.
However, Psaki and the Democrats never had the will to condemn evil unless it served them some political purpose. Now, speaking badly about people with a certain level of melanin in the Middle East will only anger voters in their party. They are very willing to pretend that the Taliban, who are currently engaged in blitz wars across Afghanistan, are willing to establish peaceful relations with other countries.
they are not. These people are evil. period.
Worryingly, Psaki would say this to these terrorists. Is the Democratic Party willing to enter into some kind of negotiation with them? Is the Democratic Party really willing to treat them as legitimate government agencies? I thought we did not negotiate with terrorists.
Why is the Democratic Party willing to do such a thing?
The Democrats knew nothing, or were blinded by their ideological conditions, so much that they actually regarded these terrorists as good people because they were not blond, blue-eyed white boys from Kansas. They seem to be reasonably willing to treat them as something they are not; reasonable.
