She completely succeeded in eliminating the threat of COVID—of course, the only thing about COVID eliminated was any possible threat that believed that the CDC had clues, but still—CDC Director Rochelle Walensky kindly Attention turned to the pressing lead problem of poisoning. The kind of forced induction.
Use one CNN provides cheerleading background Jumping over the top Jen Psaki so blatantly would be embarrassed by President Biden’s approach. Ms. Wallensky has decided that the Centers for Disease Control is now selected as the great government superhero to squeeze her trigger on the street.
Of course, Varensky did not express it in such an exaggerated way. Instead, through CNN’s Elizabeth Cohen’s more framework, she aimed at the human perspective. Because all this is related to children, we care! ! ! a lot of! ! !
Cohen: “In Chicago last weekend, 74 of us were shot and killed. On the same weekend, five teenagers shot at a party in Florida. On the same weekend, a man in Times Square in New York City shot from behind. This list goes round and round, round and round. Is there any way to do this?”
Valensky: “Something has to be done for this. So 40,000 people die every year from gun-related deaths. There are 120,000 serious gun-related injuries every year. The scope of the problem is even bigger than we have heard. , And when you feel heartache every day, you will open the news. You only heard the tip of the iceberg.”
Cohen: “When you woke up on Monday morning and heard all the reports of children who were shot last weekend, how did you feel as the director of the CDC?”
Valensky: “It’s too heavy. It hurts. Before I became the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, I was very injured. I don’t think any American citizen who opens the news can understand the other of these mass violence issues.”
Oh, but don’t be afraid, you bitter people… well, those who have really read the Second Amendment. Valensky did not propose a large-scale gun robbery or similar things! No, Bob!
She wants to talk!
Cohen (voice-over): “This time, she hopes that the CDC and gun owners will find common ground.”
Valensky: “We agree that we don’t want people to die. Let’s reach an agreement there. What can we do to prevent people from dying?”
Cohen (voice-over): “She wants to alleviate the fear of gun owners.”
WALENSKY: “For those who are concerned about research in this field, the word’gun’ is generally followed by the word’control’. This is not what I want to do here. I am not here to discuss gun control. I am here. It is to prevent gun violence and gun deaths.”
Cohen (Voiceover): “She wants gun owners to participate in CDC research to save lives.
Cohen: “If the gun owner says to you,’Doctor. Varensky, I’m afraid you want to take my gun?'”
Valensky: “My answer is to be part of the solution. Come to the table. Join our conversation. I don’t want you to feel that way. Right? I want you to teach me what you did to make sure Your gun is safe. Then I want you to teach others.”
At this point, one can elaborate on how the hope she expressed includes how the same gun owner in this conversation has at least the common sense God has given to a goose, if not more. Therefore, they not only know how to, but actually practice maximum gun safety at home. See, they are not a problem. Almost everyone is very happy to provide a quick and comprehensive course on gun safety to anyone who makes a request.
The problem is that people acquire guns, usually illegally, in order to use them illegally—to cheer themselves up. Those whose views of human nature are distorted and evil enough to take the lives of others for material gain or “lack of respect” are amazing and magical to those who believe in pursuing lollipop dreams in the marshmallow sky Erase all evil from the earth, indifferent to the basic doctrines of gun safety. They are diseased pests, and they are worth nothing except the highest punishment stipulated by the law.
Putting aside the common paranoia that anyone in any government office makes the slightest mention of guns, of course, every legal and responsible gun owner wants guns out of the hands of criminals. The said legal and responsible gun owners hope that all other legal and responsible gun owners know how to handle guns safely and correctly. In addition, if fanatical anti-gun paranoids are not allowed to use simple gun ownership as a sign of mental illness, there will be no detractors to re-commit to the promise of mental health measures. this is a problem.
The biggest problem with Varensky joining this dispute is that she has won a fundamental distrust in areas where partisan governments are not allowed to exceed their powers.She already Can’t tell her story straightforwardly About COVID.Valensky provided zero evidence that she would not turn the issue of national interest into Channels of Family Economic BenefitsThese are not signs of someone who is capable of negotiating in the crazy waters of this country involving guns.
No sane gun owner thinks that the current situation in Chicago and other places is acceptable. In the common incident file, gunfire deaths and dog bites are acceptable. He also believes that anyone should follow Criminals take all available legal methods of guns.
However, Walensky’s approach is not so much an action plan as a fantasy. Unless she plans to somehow devise a method to purify the evil in people’s hearts (no disrespect, but she is not up to the task), it won’t work at all—whatever she wants.
