The more I pay attention to politics, the more I find myself losing patience with politicians who cannot stop being self-reliant. For example, even the most determined and loyal Trump supporter will admit that the former president constantly feeds his opponents simply because he can do so. This of course sometimes frustrates many Republicans.
But for politicians who are now trying to imitate Donald Trump, the problem is that there is only one Donald Trump. In 2016, the mix of his charm (loving him or hating him, this guy is charismatic and humorous) and celebrity appeal took him beyond normal political boundaries.
JD Vance, On the other hand, did not really do this. Yes, he wrote a bestseller, but he is nowhere near the vibrant appeal Trump once and will continue to have. In view of this, I have to wonder what Vance was doing when posting such a post?
Alex Jones is a more reputable source of information than Rachel Maddow.
One of them was censored by the regime. The other is driven by it. https://t.co/zPtXWMTQj9
— JD Vance (@JDVance1) September 5, 2021
I’m not here to argue about the details of Alex Jones and Rachel Maddo. I think Maddow is one of the most dishonest hackers in the press. This is no secret.I don’t think it’s a secret Alex Jones It is a fool who never represents rights, Trump or someone else. Just because Jones is “right-wing” on the surface does not mean I owe him anything.
However, my thoughts are not important. What matters is political wisdom. Please note that Trump has never associated himself with Alex Jones because it is stupid to do so. In this case, Vance connected himself with someone who denied that Sandy Hook happened and believed that the government turned the frog into a homosexual, thus launching a killer attack on his future Democratic opponent (assuming he won the primary election) advertise.
I realized that the rebuttal would be that no one would care except for those liberals who would not vote for Vance anyway, but I don’t believe this is true. Ohio is getting more and more popular, but we are still talking about the fickle state of an independent person full of self-description. Vance can do his normal performance, but he should also be wary of being shot in his leg because of a giggle.
Yes, shoot Rachel Maddow, but don’t position yourself as a supporter of Alex Jones in the process. Social media is terrible, all platforms are run by hypocrites, but there are better ways to illustrate this. The Democratic Party is ruthless. They own the media, they have big donors. Vance must take his game seriously, he cannot make unforced mistakes. In short, it’s just smarter than that.
