We have written before about how the prosecutor imploded his case in the Kyle Rittenhouse trial.There Is the opening speech Prosecutor Thomas Binger claimed that Rittenhouse was chasing Joseph Rosenbaum, rather than the opposite.Then he Interrogate his own witnesses It seems that they don’t know what they will answer—Richie McGinniss said Rosenbaum rushed to Rittenhouse and said, “Fuck you!” Grabbing Rittenhouse’s gun, Ryan Balch said Rosenbaum threatened to kill him and Rittenhouse.
Today may be the end of their complete bombing case. The defender is questioning Geiger Ross Kreutz, the third man Rittenhouse shot.Grosskreuz Accepted He pushed towards Rittenhouse and pointed the gun at him, and then Rittenhouse shot him. Look at the reaction of one of the prosecutors and court stenographers. This is priceless.
The Rittenhouse trial should end immediately. pic.twitter.com/PHZnHS5rD9
— Viva Frei (@thevivafrei) November 8, 2021
Now, for anyone reporting the trial, this will be the highlight of the day. Maybe the whole trial. Of course, the main content that the media should emphasize, right?
Maybe not so much. Today we will take a look at how the media reported Grosskrutz’s testimony. We know that many people just read the title, and this is what they will see. Not to mention, these stories themselves miss key facts or are partially inaccurate.
The only survivor shot by Kyle Rittenhouse during the Kenosha protests testified that he thought he was “dead” https://t.co/A4ablI7sS5
— CBS News (@CBSNews) November 8, 2021
Then there are the incredibly deviating headlines.
The man who survived the Kyle Rittenhouse shooting in Kenosha, Wisconsin last August testified on Monday that he never tried to kill the heavily armed teenager. In fact, he said in the youth murder trial that he actually wanted to surrender to him. https://t.co/pg9h6lrQYH
-Daily Beast (@thedailybeast) November 8, 2021
fully armed? Rittenhouse has a gun, Grosskreutz has a gun. Why is one described as “fully armed” and the other not?
They apparently missed the part about Grosskreutz’s admission that Rittenhouse didn’t shoot until he pointed the gun at him.
The following are the headlines from Reuters and the Washington Post. Reuters runs Grosskreutz alleging he tried to disarm Rittenhouse.
-Dr. Nikarama (@nickaramaOG) November 9, 2021
how? Point the gun at him?
-Dr. Nikarama (@nickaramaOG) November 9, 2021
This is a clip from the local Fox radio station WGHP Fox 8 in North Carolina.
See how the local news reported today’s Rittenhouse trial.
They created another reality. This is an error message. pic.twitter.com/G91MM8IFQO
-Oilfield Rando (@Oilfield_Rando) November 8, 2021
Note that they cut off the description of the action before Rittenhouse was attacked, claiming that when Rittenhouse fired, he “raised his arm”.
You see, this is a reasonable sample of what they shoveled out.
We see how the media portrays today’s trial, so we can see how misleading it is because we know what happened during the trial. We cannot always see all the facts in stories reported by the media in the way we are here. However, this is how they conduct the trial? Are they kidding? They want to know why Americans no longer trust them? This is a perfect example.
But if they are honest about what happened in today’s trial, this will be a more accurate description of what happened to the prosecution.
Rittenhouse prosecuted after the witness Grosskreutz admitted that he was shot and killed only after he drew a gun at Kyle and advanced at him pic.twitter.com/yvzeowUzF3
-Tim Pond (@Timcast) November 8, 2021
