There are some very bad opinions about the ongoing trial involving Kyle Rittenhouse. Since the shocking video of the shooting was circulated on the Internet on the night of the Kenosha riots more than a year ago, the then 17-year-old is now known for shooting two people to death and wounding a third. A safe haven for controversy. If you have been living under the rocks, Rittenhouse was in Kenosha that night, hoping to help anyone who might be injured by the riots with first aid. The riots later caused more than 50 million U.S. dollars in damage. He also happened to be carrying AR-15, which was lent to him by another person there to help him patrol the streets. After several threats from one person, Rittenhouse was chased by that person until Rittenhouse felt that the man was a threat to him and his gun, causing Rittenhouse to shoot and kill him. When Rittenhouse fled and tried to reach the cordon a few blocks away, he was chased by several others. One of the men tried to hit Rittenhouse with a skateboard and then tried to grab Rittenhouse’s gun, resulting in Rittenhouse shot the man and killed him instantly. When the other man approached Rittenhouse with a gun in his hand, Rittenhouse shot him, hitting him in the arm. Rittenhouse called the police and went home. Later he surrendered to the police.
In the following weeks and months, Rittenhouse was slandered by the left as a white supremacist. He appeared in protests that night looking for people to kill. They believe that, without the slightest evidence to support this belief, Rittenhouse hunted people that night, bent on murdering those he killed. Never mind multiple videos shot from several different angles, including those showing that Rittenhouse only took the shots needed to eliminate the threat; this kid is the embodiment of all mistakes in America…guns, whites, masculinity, of course There is anything against violence on the left.
Imagine that night in Charlottesville, where idiot supremacists clashed with counter-protesters, except for a young black man in the crowd, who provided first aid to anyone who might need it. This young man is carrying Glock 43. Although gun laws in Virginia are different, in some cases, if the carrier is over 18 years old, it is still legal to open it. For our practice, our young man was 18 years old and was permitted to carry the gun. At night, a white supremacist attacked the child, causing him to react immediately and fatally. When the child fled, another white supremacist tried to hit the child with his tiki torch and then picked up his gun, causing the young black man to shoot and kill him. When another white supremacist tried to shoot him, the young black man fired again, releasing the threat and allowing the young man to flee the scene.
Now tell me that the left will not strongly support him. In fact, conservatives should do the same. The point is, if we are honest with ourselves, do we think that conservatives will support this child and enthusiastically support this child as we support Rittenhouse? Look at what happened when a white supremacist hit and killed several people with his car and injured many of them. Are we conservatives united in rejecting this? almost not.
So we can clearly understand that behind the issue of guns, the left will see a way of unity. After all, whenever it comes to the left, principles rank second after gaining political points or defeating the right. When gun crimes in Liberty City were mentioned in the gun law debate, they ignored it or deviated from it, not because they did not oppose these killings, but because they had no answer to the fact that the gun law failed to prevent any killings. However, despite these problems, we can still see a place where the left will defend a young black child who uses a gun to carry out deadly operations.
So why do the left hate Rittenhouse so much? Putting aside all the weird exaggerations of white supremacy, although the case is very clear that this is a fact of self-defense, why did they convict him of murder? I can tell you the exact reason. Rittenhouse is not white. The fact is not that he is there, but probably to oppose the riots.
This is the type of gun carried by Rittenhouse. In fact, it provides answers to the questions that leftists have always wanted to ask:
Why does anyone need AR-15?
In just a few minutes, Rittenhouse issued three threats without killing anyone around him. He is a 17-year-old kid who uses the label that they like to put on indiscriminate weapons of war. With their understanding of guns, he should have seen Rittenhouse shooting everywhere, except for the innocent bystanders he happened to find. Nor did he hit himself in the line of fire. but it is not the truth. Most of Rittenhouse’s shots hit the intended target. He was not kicked all over the floor with a gun, he used his weapon calmly and accurately. There is no hole the size of a Coke can for personnel and mass casualties. What they think will leave a devastating mark is actually much more than that.
But beyond the image, there is meaning. What does anyone need AR-15 for? This is the exact situation. When the world and society around you collapse, like in this sleepy Wisconsin small fort, you may need this weapon to protect yourself and/or your family. Of course, the choice of gun is up to you, but in these situations using AR-15 and other types of tactical/sports rifles proved to be an effective choice.
This is what the left absolutely hates. They want to slaughter. They want to be able to point this out and say that this is why no one needs AR-15. However, they didn’t get it. They want a topic. They want a Sandy Hook or Pulse nightclub. They are expecting a chainsaw. What we saw was a scalpel. Instead of a scalpel in the hands of some skilled surgeons. He is a 17-year-old boy, and the gun is not even his. Well… this is why they hate Kyle. They hate Kyle because he showed the world why someone might need AR-15.
