DUntil the government statement issued by the Prime Minister of Bavaria Marcus Soder (CSU) held a long and difficult meeting in the state legislature on Wednesday. As early as the spring of 2019, there was the first draft of the Bavarian climate protection law. The law was not passed until the end of 2020, and it was torn by professionals due to its dentinlessness. When the Bavarian state government announced the new climate protection law after the Karlsruhe climate protection ruling, the Bavarian state government implicitly agreed to this assessment.
The draft drafted by the Bavarian Environment Minister Thorsten Glauber from free voters has also been published for a few weeks. There are different opinions as to why the design has fouled.inside Ministry of Environment It is generally believed that he has gone too far, especially for the CSU parliamentary group. The National Prime Minister’s Office reported that there was a lack of a holistic approach and that the measures listed by the Minister of the Environment were not firmly funded.
Borrowing from Obama and Churchill
In any case, Sodd is looking for a big single serve again. At the beginning of his government statement, he once again used the floods in the past few days as an opportunity to give out “clear warnings and alarm bells.” It is not enough to make quicker adjustments to climate change. It is also necessary to promote climate protection to “prevent climate overturning.” Söder started well, not just taking on bonds Barack Obama, And Winston Churchill: Act today!
However, when listing the principles he hopes to position in the response to climate change, it is clear that “actions” will be limited to gradualism. Climate protection should not be an “elite project”-vulgo: even people with lower incomes should be able to afford their Mallorca holidays. The ban is “not a panacea.” So: “Guardrail, yes, but not just a stop sign.” Söder’s newly set goal that compensation should flow into the protection of the “Bavarian climate” through the “new carbon dioxide compensation platform” seems to be still immature. In any case, Martin Hagen, the leader of the parliamentary group of the Liberal Democratic Party, later rightly opposed that when it comes to climate protection, “it is not the Bavarian climate, but the global climate.”
I look forward to Söder’s speech on wind and solar energy. He himself has long supported the mandatory use of solar energy in new buildings, but the coalition partners are opposed by free voters.On the other hand, during Soder’s gatherings, free voters tend to lean or at least hone the 10-H distance rule when building new wind turbines. Colorado State University stand right here. The Prime Minister resolved this dilemma by not solving or only half of it.
How to motivate citizens to do more climate protection?
Solar obligations should be in Bundestag election Let the federal government fight for it. If this doesn’t happen, this topic will be “brought up again” in Bavaria. The 10-H rule is also followed, Söder refers to the construction of new factories sometimes causing “endless disputes.” However, in national forests or areas that already have wind turbines, the permit barrier will be removed. Upgrading (“repowering”) existing systems should also be easier.
