Meghan Markle’s private information is handed over with William’s approval-court veteran

Prince William and Kate Middleton Will authorize an assistant to reveal Meghan MarklePrivate message, Elizabeth IISaid the former spokesperson.

The Duchess of Sussex is locked in a High-stakes litigation with British tabloids Sunday Mail He was forced to apologize last week for misleading the London Court of Appeal.

The breach of responsibility occurred after her former communications secretary Jason Knauf (Jason Knauf), Reposted This destroyed the documents submitted by her legal team in the past.

He is the same assistant who accused Meghan of bullying two PAs outside Kensington Palace in 2018, and he represents the Duchess, her husband Prince Harry, Prince William And Kate Middleton.

Knauf is still working for William and Kate’s Royal Foundation charity, although he will leave at the end of the year.

Dickie Arbiter previously worked for Knauf, but served Queen Elizabeth II from 1988 to 2000 and was asked if he needed the approval of William and Kate to get it on True Royal TV Royal beat.

He replied: “I will spend my money on it.”

Previously, the newspaper’s editor Ted Verity stated in a witness statement that in addition to Knauf, they have another source of “advanced” information.

In the chat show, Royal writer Duncan Lacombe added: “From Sunday Mail Will contact Jason Knauf to know these emails
exist.

“That’s the point. Jason is most likely to go to William and Kate. If they don’t know, he won’t work with these lawyers.”

The lawsuit revolved around a letter Meghan sent to her father Thomas Markle in August 2018, asking him to stop talking to the media.

Her lawyer had previously stated that she did not expect a letter from her to her father to be leaked, nor did she cooperate with the biographer. Find freedom, Which mentioned this letter.

However, the text produced by Knauf shows that she wrote a handwritten note to “Dad”, so if this letter is made public, it will pull “heartstrings”.

An email shows that she authorized Knauf to introduce to the author Find freedom Contains detailed information on a range of topics, including Queen Elizabeth II’s feelings about the Duchess’ wedding day headdress, although the letter was not mentioned in the news.

These revelations prompted Megan to submit a 20-page witness statement in which she said: “I didn’t see the benefits of these emails, and I apologized to the court because I didn’t remember these exchanges at the time.

“I have absolutely no intention or intention to mislead [The Mail on Sunday] Or the court.

“In fact, if I knew about these exchanges when I served the revised reply, I would be more than happy to mention them because I think they strongly support my case.”

Jason was originally a member of Megan’s former employees identified by the tabloid, and they may know Megan’s intention to write.

At first, the group hired the same law firm, Addleshaw Goddard, who told the privacy and copyright case that Knauf was unwilling to participate.

However, despite the tabloids appealing the judge’s ruling, Megan won a huge victory without trial in February.

Interview with Oprah Winfrey

Meghan and Harry later accused the Palace of playing a role in spreading lies about her in an interview. Oprah Winfrey.

Knauf submitted his resignation at the Royal Foundation in May and subsequently provided new information to support Sunday MailCase.

However, he was not the only contact for the newspaper because court documents showed that a well-informed person told the publisher that Knauf had changed his mind.

One document read: “Until July 2021, [The Mail on Sunday] Received information from confidential sources to the effect that Mr. Knauf now regrets not providing us with witness statements. “

It added: “[The Mail on Sunday] In September 2020, after being informed by sources that he (Mr. Knauf) had relevant evidence to provide relevant evidence in important aspects of the case, he tried to get in touch with Mr. Knauf. “

January 2020, The newspaper told the judge in the original case of the High Court A “premium” royal source who provided information to Ted Verity.

Verity said in a witness statement: “The source has direct knowledge of what they told me, which are listed below.

“I have no reason to believe that the source of the information is completely true.”

He added: “This is not gossip or gossip: I think this is high-level information from a serious individual who has a right and responsibility, and he knows the meaning of what they tell me.”