Last week, Senator Rand Paul beaten the lawn dwarf of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases leader Dr. Anthony Fauci at the hearing about the Wuhan virus.
Paul warned Fauci that he would ultimately be responsible for his role in funding the so-called “enhancement” research conducted by the Wuhan Virus Research Institute, which is operated by the Chinese military and subject to US or international supervision.
This is communication.
Although Senator Paul is ready, all Fauci has is a legal statement about how the Wuhan virus cannot be a virus reported in the scientific literature, and no one actually made such a statement. Then he fell into a painful denial of his definition of “function gain” research.He shouted neener-neener He twitched weakly many times. Paul followed up the hearing by sending a criminal referral to the Department of Justice, accusing Fauci of lying to Congress (fact check: he did).Look Senator Paul requested criminal referral from the Justice Department, accusing Fauci of lying to Congress.
As i reported Both the left and the right agree that Dr. Fauci is a hypocritical and evasive weasel in his answer to Senator Rand Paul., Even the Washington Post did not buy what Fauci sold.
In response, Fauci ran away and curled his tail on his fan network MSNBC, where he boldly claimed that Paul had slandered him. This is the entire clip; the key part is in the tweet below.
“I don’t like conflicts with Senators,” Dr. Fauci said after an intense exchange with Senator Paul, adding that Paul was “completely out of date” and “made some inflammatory remarks, I believe, defamatory swearing in.” pic.twitter.com/aSvnYd3ndI
— MSNBC (@MSNBC) July 21, 2021
This is just nonsense. To make something slander, it must be false. What Paul said is wrong, let alone wrong. Paul was just “untimely” in the tongue bath that Fauci usually accepts when he comes out of a flattering cocoon to make a statement. Paul treated him like any other third-level bureaucrat and accused him of lies and failures. None of what Paul said was provocative. Fauci is one of the funders of the research on the acquisition of functions of the Chinese military… Obviously, Fauci thinks this is a good idea, which should show that his reasoning ability is not so fast. The “scientific consensus” is that the Wuhan virus was genetically modified and probably originated from the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The spread of the virus from the laboratory to the world’s population is inconclusive.My personal theory is that this is deliberate, to evaluate the test operation of the Western response mechanism to biological attacks, but it is a Another day’s storyAll in all, Paul’s only crime was Offended your majesty. He just didn’t respect Fauci. I would like to admit that this situation could have been handled more intelligently, but after the past year, we are at a point where those who deliberately caused pain and death to the American people do not consider their feelings.
Ron Johnson of Wisconsin is absolutely right.
“He is guilty. He is lying and he needs to be held accountable.”
bingo. It’s all right. Fauci is at least partially responsible for the development of the Wuhan virus. His actions need to be reviewed because he has an unresolvable conflict of interest between protecting the American people and concealing his guilt for the pandemic.For a long time, Fauci suppressed any dissenting voices in the scientific community by using likable printing presses, flattering staff, and the influence provided by his multi-billion dollar research fund. Slide one error to another, see Rand Paul points out how Fauci intimidated other scientists into silence.
As we learn more about the origin of the Wuhan virus, we will also learn more about the role of Fauci and his organization in this disaster. If the Republicans take back the House and Senate next year, which at this point looks better than the 50-50 proposal, and people like Rand Paul take up leadership roles, we will be able to call on bureaucrats to make their hands public in this way Stained with blood.
