widthHe watched the so-called Trier on Sunday night in order to finally understand the most important programs of the three prime minister candidates. In the past few weeks, he has not read newspapers, never turned on the radio, and avoided all news on any social media. Registered TV show.So this kind of person probably didn’t watch the trial, especially if you don’t need a prophet to doubt Annalena Balbok, Armin Laschet, and Olaf Scholz cannot measure the intensity of the “crime scene” or the emotional impact of Hollywood movies.
So is this a waste of time? Gunter JochThe honorary talk show host raised this point. After Trier, in the so-called analysis dialogue of the host broadcaster RTL, he raised the argument that the question of who has won is one. The other is whether this will affect the voting decision, which he doubts. Jauch used it to push the entire evening’s TV into irrelevant areas-and staged one of the most beautiful performance contradictions: we are here to analyze and use important expressions, but in fact it doesn’t matter.
Representative needs agency
Or maybe two women, at first glance you want to prove deep political ignorance, namely Motsi Mabuse (known from the “Let’s Dance” show) and Louisa Dellert (influencer), how embarrassing when they are right anyway , Insisting that they saw something worth talking about and might be important in which party they voted for. Louisa Dellert believes he has seen someone who was a little nervous and stopped Olaf Scholz a little bit. Motsi Mabuse seems to be attracted by Annalena Baerbock’s body language and perceived aggression Armin Rashetz A bit repulsive.
Both have adopted an attitude suitable for such plans. The program is well known, it is about performance.It’s about tone and facial expressions, gestures and posture-whoever considers these non-political standards not only forgets the political successes, for example, Helmut Kohl has an obvious unshakable physical quality with Angela Merkel Victory was won with stoic indifference. Compared with people, characters, and bodies, it is meaningless to represent less reliance on programs: the prime minister who travels abroad (or receives it abroad) not only represents the interests of her country; she embodies it in some way. And as a citizen of this country, you almost have to agree with her (Angela Merkel was more relaxed, friendly, and cheerful in most international conferences than before the federal press conference. This is also true for those who did not vote. Good news). Those who talk to the people manage to show their sense of belonging and outstanding performance at the same time, then they have the best chance.
In this sense, the performance on Sunday was not very good. Anyone who runs his own program at the appropriate volume accurately and accurately is still just running the program. Anyone who rejects every witty sentence, every sarcasm, and admits that they don’t know something is not only disrespect for the wisdom of the audience. He also revealed that it is difficult for him to imagine things outside the party’s program. However, this is where the moral, aesthetic, and possible religious sources of good political power lie. At the same time, it is also a place where people sit down and watch, as it was said that night, and can be picked up. If it is a political task to ensure a good life for the people, then politicians should be able to see this life in their performances.
