The FBI’s presence in Kenosha raises a series of questions, and the answers to all of these questions should trigger every alert in the book.
Rittenhouse’s trial is a miracle worth watching, simply because Prosecution statement This case is the wreckage of a train from a dumpster fire.We have seen that the defense has fully submitted almost all the content proposed by the prosecution because The judge continues to make a statement This may benefit the defense’s case. However, an interesting thing happened in the court, even I wiped it. Here, we talked about the various videos shot at the scene and what they showed. This is a video from one angle, a part of the street, and a video from another angle, showing the people who participated in the filming.After that FBI drone video There is also a video on the ground in front of the gas station right above the shot. Each video provides a unique perspective on… etc… Go back for a minute… What is that part of the FBI drone?
Why is there an FBI drone directly above the shooting? Have we considered what this actually means? Our government, for any reason they consider to be a threat, can carry out large-scale surveillance on you without authorization? Of course, this is a public place. The court ruled that surveillance can be carried out in a public place without a search warrant. However, there are local police resources. If the FBI cannot prevent or prevent what is happening, why should they conduct such surveillance? Regardless of its legitimacy, should we as citizens accept this as a normal idea? Out of generosity, let us say that they have some reason to place a drone above their heads. Why is this specific area? The Kenosha riots covered dozens of blocks in the town, so if they are conducting surveillance, do they use multiple drones for surveillance? There are two very simple answers to this question: yes and no.
Well, I am a negative person, so let’s never start. Why is this drone? Why is this area? Probably the most important thing is (I can use the voice of Alex Jones, my least favorite), how did you directly end the shooting that night, even though bad things happened in all other parts of the city ?Although I have never been a conspiracy theorist and hate conspiracy theories, it seems a coincidence Kenosha has an area of dozens of square blocks There was violence that night. Will you end up directly participating in the shooting that will cause a national debate? I can’t be the only person here who thinks this is very convenient.
If the answer is yes, then the next question we should ask ourselves is, how many? Why did the FBI decide to use so many drones? If there are so many drones, how many are there in each area? Why are these areas? Are there any specific threats in these areas? Are local law enforcement agencies involved? Do they know? Can they access the video source? Now, out of generosity, let us assume that these questions are answered in a way that justifies the cause, but the answer to the question: for what purpose? Has the local authority been notified of ongoing criminal activities? Are they sent to any area where crime is taking place? How many crimes did FBI drones prevent or prevent?
We should consider that maybe that is not the goal of drones. Maybe they just watched there and then used the video to arrest all the perpetrators of the riots and robberies in Kenosha. So how many people were arrested? How many people have been sued for videos? How many business owners have specific suspects and they can apply civil remedies to them? Can we see the video of all the drones that night? what is that…. ?this FBI lost video In this case from that night? We do know that this means that the FBI violated federal law, right?
The point is that the answers to these questions are of no benefit. We know that they have at least one drone, but if there is one, it is in a very specific area, don’t you think? If there are more than one, why are there so many, if there are so many, what can you accomplish with them, and if the answer is what, why are they in the first place?
Are you satisfied with the random and unnecessary surveillance of an organization that is recognized as violating federal law and has proven to be incompetent cesspools?
OK. Neither do I.
