Before I get into this article, I want to clarify that I don’t think pornography is a good thing. I saw stories about how the women involved were exploited, abused, and how the industry was flooded with sex transactions, resulting in the entire website being shut down or taking drastic measures to ensure that their website cannot be played by the owner of scammers.
Delving into the science of pornography seems to be a group of prejudiced and contradictory studies. They say it is addictive, others say it is not. Some people say that it ruins the marriage, and some people say that it might help them become stronger. Personally, I mistakenly believe that it is destructive because I have seen personal testimony of addiction and heartbreak in the industry. Some people have the opposite experience, but in general, the bad news outweighs the good news.
Now, after the right-leaning pornographic star Brandi Love (Brandi Love) appeared and subsequently withdrew from the turning point activities in the United States because of her, the Internet has begun to discuss how pornography can be integrated into the conservative big tent profession.
According to Daily Caller, Love called this a “bad” example of abolishing culture:
Is this an example of abolition culture? This is one of its more shocking examples. At the beginning of the show, TPUSA talked about how we need to counter the large-scale technology censorship system, cancel the culture, and the deterioration of our First Amendment. Charlie Kirk literally talks about making sacrifices as an outspoken “conservative.” I have been taking huge risks and huge losses for many years. Then they fired me. It’s hard to make up. This is the worst example of abolishing culture.
This sparked a debate about whether Love can really become a “conservative” and become a porn star. Many conservative big names say she can, while others say she can’t. I will post multiple tweets, but I think the conversation between Matt Walsh and John Cardillo is a good example.
To be honest, I don’t know what the word “conservative” means, if it includes welcoming hardcore porn stars to events for conservative teenagers https://t.co/sa64zEU0YS
-Matt Walsh (@MattWalshBlog) July 19, 2021
This is a deal; they are all right.
First of all, Love shouldn’t participate in youth conferences. I’m not entirely sure why she thinks attending conferences is a good idea. I firmly believe that what adults do is theirs, but these are children and many of them are susceptible. It is impossible for her career not to appear in the conversation. When it does, what will she say to these children?
We are very angry with the leftist introductory and sexy young generation, but how many young men and women will talk to Love about her career, be fascinated by her, and therefore be introduced to pornography? How many young people will be obsessed with it? How many young women are looking forward to starting a OnlyFans? How is this different in principle?
I know these are hypothetical scenarios, but they are scenarios that are more likely to happen under the influence of Love. I very much doubt that she will push them away from her career. She made it clear on Twitter that she liked it.
But the other side of the inconvenience is that many people will call themselves conservatives, and each of them will argue about why they can do such a thing. Each of these people will make others argue why they are not conservatives.
But saying that they are not conservative does not prevent them from becoming conservative. The honest truth is that you and Brandi Love agree on a lot of topics, but you disagree on this issue. You may vote for many of the same people based on many common principles, many of which have nothing to do with principles that you disagree with.
You might say “conservatism and Christian principles are the same thing”, but the fact is that many people in the Conservative era are not Christians. I’m not sure if this will make them less conservative. I agree that the founding principles of the United States are Judeo-Christian in nature, but many people will argue that freedom and the right to happiness are what they are trying to protect, not the origin of these principles themselves.
The bottom line is that we should protect freedom and the pursuit of happiness, but decency goes a long way to make this happen. If we are to have a prosperous and healthy country, we really must take care of the moral health of our country, and one of the most reliable ways to do this is to ensure that more explicit adult activities are not introduced to children and adult products are placed in Adult place.
What love does is love, as long as she does not try to influence young people to do what she does in one form or another, but should she be banned? any A gathering of conservatives? I do not believe. I believe she has a lot of things to discuss about our country, and she may have some very effective views on these things. In activities that are not suitable for teenagers, her voice is no less than that of anyone else.
And I’m not entirely sure whether it’s wise for rights to become so exclusive that we immediately started throwing people who didn’t meet certain definitions of “conservatism” to the side of the road. If you want to talk about landslides, that may eventually prevent everyone from becoming a “conservative.”
