One of the mantras repeatedly heard by the US news leader CNN is how Fox News fuels anti-vaccine sentiment. Their desire to discredit their competitors is so ingrained that in the past few weeks, as more and more broadcasters on Fox encourage vaccinations, Brian Stewart and other media figures are still criticizing the Internet… …Because they did what they accused them of not doing.
However, as this mentality continues to be broadcast on CNN every day, there is something missing from their sharp point-evidence. Although the desire to accuse Fox as the cause of the unvaccinated outbreak is strong, the evidence provided is very weak. But this is not to say that there is no evidence. CNN’s lack of evidence was provided by other news media, and their findings did not receive a response from their anchor, which is understandable.
One starting point is the Caesars Foundation’s poll, which shows that most people who refuse to get vaccinated are not entirely from Tucker Carlson’s audience:
Only 20% of the group call themselves Republicans, and the other 19% are independents who lean toward the Republican Party. The overwhelming majority (61%) are not Republicans (41% said they are Democrats or independents leaning towards Democrats, and 20% are purely independents or unspecified people).
Ironically, not only is this poll not mentioned in these attacks on Fox, It was actually reported on CNN. Another favorite rumor is that Christian fanatics who refuse to be shot due to their religious foundation are in the majority. According to Data Progress, a progressive polling organization, other data shows that this is not the case, as non-religious people are more likely to resist.
When it comes to hesitation, evangelicals are not some huge outliers either.
Half of the people also hesitated!
% It is unlikely to say “very” or “somewhat” among those who have not been vaccinated in May:
Evangelicals: 59%
Non-evangelical: 63%
Catholicism: 49%
None: 52% pic.twitter.com/aZFU8bk0sQ— Ryan Birch📊 (@ryanburge) July 14, 2021
Now let’s take a look at the recent controversy in the White House. According to the government, they want to target 12 accounts on social media and they are most responsible for vaccine misinformation. It should be noted that these listed are not Fox News, but they are not cited sources on the Internet either. So this covers the lack of urgency of the cursed fox, but what about the people themselves? They must be loyal Fox audiences, right?
No, they are not.An article in the New York Times A long-term study of people who have resisted the vaccine, And these are not militant political resistance. They just have fear, anxiety and doubts about all aspects of t.He was vaccinated. “I reported the main gains of this article,“The writer Julie Bosman said. “It’s just that people are complicated, they are really scared of this vaccine, and they don’t always make quick, linear decisions. There are still millions of people who can be persuaded.”
As this narrative about Fox’s push for an anti-vax mentality in the country is disintegrating, let’s look at another report that failed to find Fox contact. David Begnaud interviewed some people who have suffered from the virus and asked them what prevented them from being vaccinated.
This week, I asked three hospitalized, unvaccinated COVID patients where they got the news.
Answer:
1.) Facebook
2.) Google
3.) Networks of people/experts from all walks of life, they communicate through text links and share what they know— David Begnaud (@DavidBegnaud) July 25, 2021
What these pointers and condescending interviewers fail to understand is that their method is the biggest flaw in the struggle to vaccinate people. A combative attitude is the opposite method of persuasion. Condescending, insulting, and uneducated hints on this matter can have the exact opposite effect. Nervous heads and those who are skeptical of the government will not be swayed by aggressive reporters.
They tried to get the crab out by tapping the shell, but paradoxically, they were too slow to realize that they were using a failed strategy. People in the media failed to deliver information because they approached the subject contemptuously, and people turned them away. They didn’t realize it was the result, and at the same time pretended to be the smartest person in the room.
Why are there so few cases where the terrible results seen from vaccines are not shown? How to explain that the fear of side effects is minimized by the side effects of the virus, and even after recovery, the side effects are more durable and realized? Those politicians and journalists who attacked unvaccinated with contempt somehow fail to see their efforts, leading these people to believe that they have been right.
