How many times has Joe Biden ranted at us, and why is he right about Afghanistan? I have lost my way, but I think this is at least the fifth “official” rant.
But this is the worst one, you can feel it. He was so angry. He is not angry with the Taliban. He will not be angry about his failure or the failure of his people. He was very angry with the people who stayed behind. Moreover, he is angry with you. He was angry with you because you did not simply accept how “extraordinary success” all this is.
He kept screaming to end the war, and no one even objected to or really talked about this-just about his incompetence in handling the war-he didn’t want to deal with it, so he kept trying to shift the focus. He had done this four times, but still didn’t realize that no one would buy this kind of wit. What do they mean by crazy means doing the same thing but expecting different results?
But he just kept saying something meaningless or obviously untrue.
Biden said that he started warning people to go out in March or April. But he also said at the same time that he himself could not see the fall of the country, “no one” could, so he cannot be blamed for not seeing it. So which is it?July, of course, he Claiming that he was not told that this country might fall. That was a lie, as we discovered later, As he was told in June this is a possibility. We have been talking about This has been possible since at least May.
He talked about Trump’s May 1 deadline-yelling is to choose between that and the army that is proliferating for more wars, and no one is talking about it. But he himself broke the deadline in April and delayed his departure by four months. So he himself proved that it was nonsense. In addition, Trump had many conditions in the agreement undermined by the Taliban, but Biden did not let them comply with the agreement, which could have controlled them.
Biden disputed the suggestion that the Americans should withdraw before he gave up the US military base in Afghanistan: “I don’t agree.” pic.twitter.com/17gNs5tjPv
— Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) August 31, 2021
He said he disagreed with those who said he should start earlier.Now, people who don’t mention him for the time being told us in July that they Efforts are being made to get the interpreter out. So they claimed in July that they were doing what he said they couldn’t do now. But he said now-imagine if they sent thousands of soldiers to rescue people during the civil war? I don’t know Joe. After they are in full control and we are at their mercy because of you, after you withdraw all the troops, would it be better to bring thousands of people with you?
But the whole point of doing it earlier is that you don’t have to do it all at once, so you can slowly, carefully, and thoroughly review everyone in a few months. So you don’t need “thousands of troops”. In addition, Biden evacuated the remaining 2,500 soldiers and had to put 6,000 back. So the troops he himself “rushed in” far exceeded the troops he withdrew. He claimed that everything he did was to reduce our participation and would only increase the risks and dangers for our people and our Afghan allies.
Biden has been trying to preach to us, believing that if he continues to yell at us ignorant farmers, even louder than he has said four times-we will believe his argument, that is, without first withdrawing It’s cool to leave the army to withdraw citizens or allies without an obvious plan. Biden even made some strange comments about Yemen, I don’t know what that means.
Biden Said:
“Remember why we went to Afghanistan in the first place? Because we were attacked by Al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden in 2001, their headquarters are in Afghanistan.
“I respectfully suggest that you ask yourself this question: If we were attacked by Yemen instead of Afghanistan on September 11, 2001-would we go to war in Afghanistan?”
Um? What does that mean? No, if he was attacked from Yemen and they harbored terrorists, we would go to Yemen. Why are we going to Afghanistan? What a strange question.
But the amazing thing about all this is that it has nothing to do with the dead. It’s not about the remaining people. In a way, it is not even meant to end the war. For Joe Biden, this is to prove that Joe Biden is correct on this issue.
There are a lot of pathological things in it, but the most antisocial is using the name/death of his own dead son for emotional blackmail. Some people may not like me saying this, but that’s the truth. He did this repeatedly in the rant of Afghanistan. He did this again in his speech on Tuesday, as he did when he met with families who lost their children in Kabul in Dover. Therefore, according to records, Joe Biden’s son Bo did not die in Afghanistan. He died of cancer. He previously served in Iraq. The family thought he talked more about his son than their son. We saw him throw Bo Biden into this speech again. He acted like a Venus father, which is not the same thing. The family knew this, and they were offended because he was doing it for themselves and not for their loved ones.
But more importantly, it is a cynical use of his son as a defense of being criticized, making it not about the facts, but about his pain, not even about the son. For me, the death of using Bo in this way is pathological, even disrespectful to his own son.
