Although Kyle Rittenhouse’s experiment has exhausted all the oxygen in the current news cycle, another piece of news is little known.This involves Controversial topic of natural immunity From COVID-19, the federal government and its policies basically treat it as non-existent.
The CDC wrote in a remarkable acknowledgment that it does not have any records of people who are naturally immune to the spread of COVID-19.
The CDC acknowledged that it does not have any documents on the spread of Covid by survivors who have not been vaccinated against Covid. pic.twitter.com/sYyvMJjhoE
-Eli Klein (@TheEliKlein) November 11, 2021
Now, it’s easy to fall into the trap of thinking that this means it doesn’t mean anything technically, and I’m sure that “fact checkers” will spit when reading the introduction of this article. But I will disappoint them because this letter does not prove that people with natural immunity will not spread COVID-19.In fact, considering the dynamics of virus transmission, people with natural immunity are likely to spread the virus like vaccinated people, but there are reasons to believe that natural immunity is More sturdy and durable.
In any case, the point here is not to debate the details of the spread of COVID-19. Instead, the lack of data is the problem here. CDC is part of the federal government Constantly diminishing and dismissing natural immunity At the policy level, they now admit that they did not even retain the data needed to judge its effectiveness. Why would they do that?
At this point, all this seems purposeful to me. If they do collect the data needed to track the efficacy of natural immunity, they may end up with an answer that they obviously don’t want. Specifically, there is no scientific need for mandatory vaccination of people who have been infected with COVID-19 and recovered from it. That would also blow up the whole “vaccine passport” argument, we can’t have it, can we?
Frankly speaking, the CDC continues to issue announcements about the requirements for universal vaccination and how the virus spreads, and it does not even track the necessary data to judge the effectiveness of natural immunity, which feels like a negligence. Because many people have been infected with the coronavirus before, collecting these data and accurately analyzing what this means for the pandemic should be a top priority. On the contrary, it continues to be largely ignored.
This is a bit of a political hindrance. Instead of formulating policies based on hard data, you get what is said to be the most advanced virus research institution in the world, and you don’t even know how contagious natural immunity is. But believe in “experts” and the like.
