Obviously, in the process of rushing to protect St. Foch, the Washington Post forgot to conduct an actual investigation.
During this pandemic, there is no shortage of word of mouth bromide in the media. From mask orders to vaccine authorization, to opposing the politicization of the virus, to accepting work stoppages to save lives, this is a series of tiresome mistakes.The other two may be mentioned more than others, and in these respects, reporters are the least flexible; we must always follow the science, and we must not question Message from Dr. Anthony Fauci.
Recently, when a story began to circulate, the deified doctor was severely criticized by society. He was behind some terrible experiments involving facilities. Use beagle puppies in strange settingsThe story is terrible, but it is also supported by photos, and the content goes viral. According to reports, foreign laboratories carrying out these terrible practices have received financial support from medical organizations headed by famous doctors.
According to four U.S. National Institutes, most of the attacks stemmed from a viral false statement that the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases led by Fauci funded a medical experiment in which beagle dogs were trapped in full Sick sand flies in the mesh cage. Health officials familiar with these calls.
Well, this harsh public relations nightmare surrounding the darling of the media is not allowed, so the Washington Post stepped in to correct the record and blame it where appropriate. You see, behind them are those despicable conservatives, and they are all lies! Except, it’s not true–nor is it true. There are many things behind this story, but the writers only describe half of the story in detail, thus saving a lot of time in order to locate their demons accordingly.
According to WaPo, the driving force behind this comes from a conservative animal rights organization. Although this sounds surprising, it seems to be the same thing.This group is called The White Coat Waste Project, which is described as being founded by a Republican agent, while the board and staff are enriched by Republican players. Then this despicable garment sent the wrong message to the conservative echo chamber, leading to a terrible reaction that dared to tarnish Fauci’s name.
The Washington Post even interviewed Dr. Fauci, who commented on his influence on the defamation campaign. “Continuous harassment in the form of absurd accusations and outright lies has made it more difficult for me and my employees to fight the covid-19 pandemic,” Fauci told the newspaper. Then he said something amazing. “This attack on me, This is obviously political to non-political scientistsI think it’s dangerous for the entire scientific field [shows] How people try to intimidate scientists. ” If you need a little time to recover from it, this is understandable. I also need some time.
The Post details the White Coat Waste Project and founder Anthony Bellotti. This was done to determine how completely Republican this group is in structure, and is therefore very good at inciting conservative anger and unfair attacks on Dr. Fauci. However, although they allowed Fauci to call the allegations a lie, the paper did not say so. There are good reasons for this.
Although it took a long time to position this group as an evil force, there is still a brief revelation. The results showed that WCWP did not fabricate the story of the beagle dog experiment funded by Fauci’s NIAID. It turns out that the Tunisian Research Department issued an official statement stating that this is indeed the case.
False statement about The funding for the Beagle study in Tunisia was based on the mistakes of scientists. Initially, researchers incorrectly listed NIAID as a funder when publishing a paper in a scientific journal in late July.
This means that WCWP announcements are based on medical research in official scientific publications, written by scientific researchers who conduct their own experiments. They follow what the media has been talking about for years-they follow science and listen to the opinions of trained medical professionals.
This story was only “debunked” by the same research laboratory Rear The public strongly protested and called for correction of bt NIAID. NIAID spent two days filtering its expenditures to determine that it did not fund the beagle experiment-although they said they did fund the same laboratory and a team of scientists, the study involved sand fleas and terriers, but only one Regarding the safety of the vaccine in experiments involving sand fleas and beagles, the vaccinated dogs can run freely to see if they are infected with the spreading disease.
If this sounds like a very convenient explanation of the trajectory of money, then you are not alone. Fauci’s foundation only funds drug experiments on dogs and sand fleas, but the funding ends here. The terrible experiments performed by the same laboratory, the same doctor, and the same beagle on the same sand fleas must be covered by different sources. certainly.
In this rescue work of Fauci, a very small piece of information is buried. PETA reiterated White Coat Waste’s false funding statement and stated that it also does not believe in the journal’s corrections.
This is what PETA is all about. For some reason, PETA repeated the exact same attack on Dr. Fauci and expressed the same level of suspicion about the weak explanation provided. They were not attacked by the Washington Post. Only conservative organizations were demonized, and the social media protests that followed were described as unfair attacks on respected doctors based on lies.
WaPo adopts this basic shooting messenger procedure, all of which is to protect Dr. Fauci’s good nature. Doing so in half of the story will make the rescue mission more superficial.
