Thursday, May 21, 2026

Fat Jerry Nadler calls on the federal government to review Kyle Rittenhouse’s verdict, the threat is real-RedState


At around 1:30 pm Eastern time today, a jury in Kenosha, Wisconsin, made the only verdict that any responsible jury could make. It found that 18-year-old Kyle Rittenhouse was acquitted of all charges for an attempted murder on the streets of Kenosha on the night of August 25, 2020. This is not a small task, and the fact that jurors perform their duties makes them heroes in my book.

The media lied mercilessly to Rittenhouse and facts (the outstanding exception is “Visual Investigation Team“The New York Times, see my post In a strange turn of events, the New York Times investigation into the Kenosha shooting provided strong reasons for self-defense.). The prosecution conspired to violate Rittenhouse’s constitutional rights by concealing evidence from the defense and claiming that the jury could infer guilt from his pretrial silence. A group of thugs seems to be composed of BLM and Antifa thugs, threatening to use violence without guilty release. A news organization…sorry, I corrected, MSNBC…attempted to harass the jurors. Joey SoftServe himself refers to Rittenhouse as a white supremacist.

Now that the jury has spoken and Rittenhouse is a free man, they believe that those who rule us will try to drag Rittenhouse into a federal court where they will face the relevant charges. This is a speech from Fat Jerry Nadler, Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee.

Legally speaking, this is just stupid. Crossing state boundaries does not constitute a federal crime. A crime must be involved. Since Rittenhouse has been acquitted of all state crimes, it is difficult to see the significance of crossing state boundaries. It can be said that those who were shot by Rittenhouse may have been participating in riots, thefts, assaults, and arson protected by the Constitution. However, the jury found that everyone who was shot that night had already arrived. In order for the jury to accept self-defense as an acceptable defense against the murder charge, it must find that Rittenhouse has reason to believe that his life is in danger. In Huber’s case, he responded to attacks aimed at killing him or incapacitating him. Lefty Grosskreutz admitted under oath that he was shot and killed only after pointing his illegal gun at Rittenhouse. Rosenbaum is a child rapist. He was probably driven crazy by desire when he attacked Rittenhouse.

The only “dangerous precedent” that can be set-it is illegal to defend yourself when someone tries to kill you-is avoided by a jury that firmly opposes threats and intimidation.

Just because Nadler’s tweet is stupid doesn’t mean it won’t happen.

Joey SoftServe said this in response to the verdict.

I have no doubt that the Ministry of Justice is looking for some way to intervene here. You will remember that Merrick Garland was the one who labeled parents attending school board meetings as “domestic terrorists” and took the FBI to court (Biden’s Department of Justice announced that it considered the school board’s protest as a threat and promised to take action) Responding to the White House’s urging (“Actively Participate”-Biden’s White House sex with NSBA before the “Domestic Terror” letter). A statement like Biden’s may trigger Garland’s uncontrollable submissive urination.

Remember, even if this attempt to actually bring a federal case from the Kenosha shooting will definitely fail, the process is punishment. Now, people are held in solitary confinement in cells without running water or normal toilets. For nearly a year, it was just a ticket for crossing the road. Putting Rittenhouse in jail, subjecting him to cruel and inhuman treatment, increasing his lawyer’s fees, and usually ruining his life, this is something that our Ministry of Justice is very, very good at, even if it is in all other aspects It’s all bad.





Source link

Related articles

spot_imgspot_img