We are now in the final stage Kyle Rittenhouse Trial In Kenosha, Wisconsin, the jury instructions and final debate are scheduled for Monday.
However, although Rittenhouse’s decision to testify in his own trial was a shock this week (and caused some Incredibly stupid moment From the prosecutor), Acknowledgment by Gaige Grosskreutz November 8th is also the absolute key to the establishment of the defense plan. You will remember that the latter was a “military doctor” holding a pistol shot by Rittenhouse in his biceps, and this moment was captured dramatically by the video.
During the interrogation, Gross Kruitz admitted that Rittenhouse did not shoot when he raised his hand. Instead, it was when Grosskreutz pointed a gun at Rittenhouse and accused the teenager of shooting.
The Rittenhouse trial should end immediately. pic.twitter.com/PHZnHS5rD9
— Viva Frei (@thevivafrei) November 8, 2021
This is caused by Video evidence This clearly shows Grosskreutz running at Rittenhouse and carrying his pistol before being shot. However, when asked about Anderson Cooper’s CNN, Grosskrutz told a completely different story.
Gaige Grosskreutz claimed on CNN that when he was shot by Kyle Rittenhouse, he raised his arm, which contradicted his sworn testimony.
read more: https://t.co/8OiyoJBJfk pic.twitter.com/yBA83CahJ5
-Post Millennial (@TPostMillennial) November 12, 2021
Can we stop and see how immoral and rude it is for a so-called news network to let this person provide so-called impartial witnesses?Although Grosskreuz Admit to wanting to kill Rittenhouse In subsequent social media posts? Maybe you let this person play after the trial, but doing so during the trial and treating him with children’s gloves is another “most trusted name in the news” that violates journalistic ethics.
Nevertheless, back to Grosskreutz, if he now claims a completely different story on CNN, he must have sworn perjury last Monday. Or on the contrary, he is now lying to the applause of cable news and telling the truth in court. What we do know is that it cannot have both. Either way, the judge should be interested in finding out why Grosskreutz will tell two different statements based on who he thinks is listening.
In any case, as I pointed out before, the video is decisive in terms of display content. Rittenhouse did not shoot Grosskrutz when he raised his arm. After Grosskreuz was approaching the top of Rittenhouse, he pointed a pistol at him and shot him. So in the end, the truth will prevail at this point.
