DDispute between Bavarian Prime Minister Markus Söder and Deputy Prime Minister Hubert Evanger (Free voters) The number of people about corona vaccination is increasing. Soder reiterated his criticism of Ivanger’s vaccination arguments in a ZDF summer interview on Sunday-and then responded sharply. He accused the chairman of the CSU league of deliberately making false assertions and talking about “rudeness.”
South Speaking of Iwanger’s exemplary suspicion of corona vaccination, he said: “I’m worried that he will push himself into a corner where he can’t get rid of himself.”.
Soder emphasized that this is not a question of whether Awanger should be vaccinated or not. Everyone can choose freely. But the voice and speech behind it are problematic: for example, when Ewanger talks about the side effects of “making him vomit”, or when he says that the vaccine has not been proven to be effective, for example. “You must be careful,” Sodd said.
Speaking of the German News Agency, Eiwanger said: “I said that whether the vaccine is effective has not been confirmed. This is a deliberate false statement. On the contrary, I said that vaccination is an important part of the fight against the coronavirus, but it must be voluntary. .”
In addition, Söder said Aiwanger used the same word selection as the top AfD candidates Alice WeidelHe warned Ivange that he was also the main candidate for free voters in the September 26 federal election, and he would fight for votes “on certain margins.” “This is a complete fallacy. In the end, people choose the right “horizontal thinker”. But if Ai Wanger approaches them, he must be careful not to be recognized. “Then it becomes really difficult. “
Aiwanger said: “I want to label myself as a’horizontal thinker’, which is outrageous, because I am opposed to mandatory vaccination and demand that children under 12 be more sensitive to vaccination, which Stiko has not yet recommended. “
However, Soder pointed out that so far, Ivange has supported every decision of the Bavarian Cabinet on anti-epidemic measures. Therefore, he sees no reason to remove Iwanger from the cabinet. In addition, he has a feeling that free voters themselves are “very dissatisfied with his speech.” He now wants to give the person a certain amount of time to reflect on the situation. The economic response to the apparent opposition to Ai Wanger was equally striking.
