Thursday, December 2, 2021
HomeElectionsJen Psaki provided cover for Fauci, falsely claiming that the US funded...

Jen Psaki provided cover for Fauci, falsely claiming that the US funded research on functional acquisition-RedState


On Thursday morning, at a White House press conference, Fox News reporter Peter Dusey confronted White House Press Secretary Jane Passaki and discussed the news. Originally manufactured in RedState in May Recently by Intercept, NIH has indeed funded functional acquisition research in the United States and around the world. At the hearing in May, I observed Fauci’s investigations after Senator Rand Paul’s statement. One study after another showed that the United States not only funded the subject research that Fauci refused to fund, but also The research was conducted in Wuhan. Institute of Virology-another thing Fauci strongly denied.

When I was writing the article, I was very interested in this work, mainly because the sources used to prove that Fauci’s statement was a lie were all NIH research. Over time, this understanding gradually faded, and it was not completely updated until the publication of The Intercept article, which confirmed everything I wrote at the time and showed that RedState was far ahead.

The media have done their part to cover up Dr. Anthony Fauci’s 80-something fraud, and even questioned the lies he fabricated at the Senate hearing, but chose to attack the Red State because they were suspected of dealing with the surge. The number of COVID-19 cases has surged. When Doocy asked this question this morning, we could almost predict Jen Psaki’s answer.

The problem with Psaki’s response is that it either highlights her complete ignorance of the issue (calling it a “COVID 2 strain” is another problem), or she is willing to continue to deceive the American people. To say that “NIH has never approved any research that would make the coronavirus more dangerous to humans” is nothing close to the truth, and it is worth Psaki’s resignation in itself.

The term “function gain” literally means the process by which scientists make viruses more deadly and spread more easily. It is the scientific process that helps viruses “gain a function that they did not have to infect and destroy before.” The whole purpose of conducting gain-of-function research is to be able to “predict” new strains of viruses that are more deadly and infectious than their predecessors. If it is not through the process of making the virus more deadly and more easily spread, it is not a gain in function.

this NIH’s own website The function gain is described as follows (emphasis added):

The term gain of function (GOF) study describes a study of modifying a biological agent in order to impart new or enhanced activity to the agent.Some scientists use this word extensively to refer to any Such modifications. However, not all studies described as GOF have the same level of risk. For example, studies that involve modifying bacteria to allow the production of human insulin, or altering the genetic programming of immune cells in CAR-T cell therapy to treat cancer are generally considered low-risk. A subset of GOF research that is expected to enhance the transmissibility and/or virulence of potential pandemic pathogens, which may make them more dangerous to humans, has been the subject of extensive review and deliberation.This GOF method is sometimes reasonable in laboratories with appropriate biosafety and biosecurity controls to help us understand the basic nature of human interaction with pathogens, assess the pandemic potential of emerging sources of infection, and provide public Provide information on hygiene and preparations, including monitoring and development of vaccines and medical countermeasures. This research will bring biosafety and biosecurity risks, and these risks must be carefully managed. With NIH funding, this subset of GOF research can only be conducted in laboratories with strict supervision and appropriate biosafety and biosafety controls to help protect researchers from infection and prevent microbes from being released into the environment.

Just in case Psaki needs some help to find it, here is a clip directly from the website:

NIH function gain definition

Virus acquisition function research is not only essentially about making viruses more dangerous and deadly to humans, but it is also so dangerous that The Obama administration ordered the suspension of all U.S.-funded functional access research in 2014, An order ignored by the National Institutes of Health. The National Institutes of Health approved the continuation of at least two functionally acquired studies and continued to fund the Eco-Health Alliance’s grant, which provided funding to the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

first It was a study that created SHC014-MA15, a hybrid coronavirus, which was highly criticized at the time as the creation of “SARS 2”. Dr. Ralph Baric is one of the main researchers at the University of North Carolina and the “godfather of gain-of-function research.” He disclosed the following in the research to show that they are working against the suspension of research, but only in the direction of the NIH.

NIH approved GOF

Second study Not only recognized the participation of WIV’s chief research scientist, but also recognized that not only the research was conducted under the funding of NIAID, but also that the research and HHS ordered a suspension with Continue under the guidance of NIH.

Baric WIV1 study
SHC014 Government Department Disclosure

also, There is also a study, A study conducted by the Wuhan Institute of Virology showed that the funding for these gain-of-function studies came from NIH/NIAID, through Dr. Shi Zhengli, director of the Wuhan laboratory, and Peter Daszak of the Ecological Health Alliance. This research was also funded and conducted during the suspension of the Obama administration’s function.

NIH funded Wuhan Institute of Virology and Daszak

Jen Psaki’s statement is a complete lie. This is not a matter of opinion.

  • Is gaining functionality a process that makes viruses more deadly? Yes.
  • Did NIH fund this research through multiple channels? Yes.
  • Was this research partly or completely carried out at the Wuhan Institute of Virology? Yes.
  • Does the research violate HHS’s order to suspend all gain-of-function research? Yes.

Her statement was inaccurate, or even inconsistent with the facts. Although it is very clear, don’t expect MSM to do anything about it.





Source link

RELATED ARTICLES

Most Popular

Recent Comments