Psaki’s sharp answer won a warm welcome from the media, but it may violate the Biden administration’s own gender rules.
Since no other controversial or dramatic events have been staged around the world, the press has been discussing the adoption of Texas New restrictive abortion law. Too many social media wizards claim that Afghan women now have more rights than American women.Then, Claire McCaskill in Meet the media, Palpitations on this issue-not because of the masculinity of the host Chuck Todd.
watch: @clairecmc Calling the Texas abortion ban “a heinous solution” in Roe v. Wade, it created “a private police force.”
“My heart beats so fast now. …I want bounty hunters after the people who raped their children” instead of hunting women seeking abortions. pic.twitter.com/Cx68WzoB9C
-Meet the media (@MeetThePress) September 2, 2021
This is a rather ironic physiological response to the “Heartbeat Abortion Law”. Hopefully, she can still get some female medical care and can undergo proper examinations.
This new law is widely circulated in the press Painted in the President of the United States as a result. As a Catholic who supports abortion, Joe Biden’s notorious spiritual conflict once again became the focus, leading to a question on this topic at today’s White House press conference.
Owen Jensen, a reporter from the Catholic media EWTN, specifically asked Joe Biden’s position on abortion and how he insisted on it when this view conflicted with his beliefs. View.
When answering questions, Jen Psaki was very concise and straightforward. “I know you have never faced these choices, and have never been pregnant, but for women who have faced these choices, it is a difficult thing.”
Reporter: “Why does the president support abortion, and his own Catholic faith teaches that abortion is morally wrong?”
PSAKI: “I know you have never faced these choices, and have never been pregnant, but for women who have faced these choices, this is a difficult thing.” pic.twitter.com/Xzz2Fwhh0O
— Townhall.com (@townhallcom) September 2, 2021
Psaki has always won praise in the media for this, and reporters praised her for closing, going to school, attacking, obliterating, and any other exaggerated descriptions of her reaction. The people on the left were just elated to the way Psaki spoke to the devilish man, but they didn’t praise her for answering his questions-because she didn’t do it.
Again, Jensen’s question has to do with Joe Biden’s position on abortion regarding his religious beliefs. Jen Psaki tried to disprove this because the reporter is a male, which is totally biased against her rant. He is not technically about abortion law, but about faith. Psaki never came close to solving this problem. But it did trigger another ghost.
If the male reporter does not have agency rights on this issue because he cannot become pregnant and does not have to face the issue in person, then this weakens the foundation of the whole position. The question is about Joe Biden’s position on this issue. Now, after a quick glance at the White House catalog, it shows that Joe Biden himself is determined to become a man. So guess what this means, Jen and the media complex? If Joe is seen as a man, then his views on abortion will be discarded.
Let us keep this moment in our back pockets and move on. Therefore, at any time, reporters can quote Joe Biden’s views on abortion, and we can quote today’s exchange: “No, sorry-Joe is showing off “Wedding Tackles”. Since he is a man, he has no reason to weigh in this matter.. “
The chaos caused by Ms. Psaki is far from cleared up—there is more. The distinction she called for invalidated the reporter on the grounds that he could not become pregnant as a male, which is in direct contradiction to the statement made by her own boss.
Recall that in June last year, the Biden administration released a proposed budget for the coming year. In this document, they worked hard to make New difference It’s not just women who can have children. Oops!
Wait a mininute–
It is offensive to suggest that only women face pregnancy. Does the White House now show 180 points in the previous position? ! Or did Jen Psaki get into trouble because he violated the government’s position on this matter? https://t.co/FWFB3eZScc pic.twitter.com/MViwEBLUoX
— Brad Slager — Focus on laser (@MartiniShark) September 2, 2021
So now, how does the government solve this problem? They not only announced the gender fluid impregnation process, but also codified it by inserting this definition into federal documents. The White House press secretary should be aware of such issues.
This is equivalent to some shameful intolerance of Jen Psaki. She also assumes the gender of the reporter and denies his agent if he tries to get pregnant someday. She needs to be forced to resign and leave her position before the end of the month-her ninth month in this job.
