oris Johnson proposes to ban Congressman When he tried to stop the dirty fight against the Conservative Party, he stopped acting as a paid political adviser or lobbyist.
He said he has written to Commons The speaker’s proposed code of conduct for parliamentarians has been updated.
He detailed his plan in a letter to Sir Lindsay Hoyle Prime Minister Say government It will ensure that “Members of Congress who ignore their duties to voters and prioritize external interests will be investigated and appropriately punished by existing disciplinary authorities”.
He added that they “will also prohibit members of Congress from taking advantage of their positions by acting as paid political advisers or lobbyists.”
The move was an attempt to draw a line between the destructive saga that began with Mr. Johnson’s attempt to overhaul the disciplinary system to prevent Owen Patterson’s immediate suspension.
Mr. Johnson’s latest plan came the day before the Labor Party voted to ban MPs from serving as paid advisers or directors in Wednesday’s opposition day debate.
Sir Keele said that the Labour Party would “carefully consider” the Prime Minister’s proposal, adding: “If he fully accepts the motion, then this is a major victory for our work to clean up politics.”
Labour Party leader Kil Starmer gave a speech at a press conference, outlining the Labour Party’s plan to improve politics ahead of Wednesday’s opposition to the Japanese debate.
/ Public broadcastingHe told reporters: “We have had the Conservative Party dirty and corrupt for two weeks. Don’t imagine that the Prime Minister did this only because his back was against the wall, because the Labor Party has already held a binding vote for tomorrow.”
Sir Keele called for a stricter crackdown. When the Prime Minister made a speech shortly before announcing his plan, he added: “It’s time to ban parliamentarians from serving as directors and business advisors.” This should not be a controversial one. Condition. “
Government and Conservative Backbenchers will find themselves in a difficult situation, either supporting the Labor Party’s plan or facing accusations that they have failed to eradicate the scandal.
This disclosure led people to question whether Torridge and West Devon councillors and a practising barrister spent enough time on his voters.
Mr. Johnson sent Sir Lindsay two important recommendations from the Public Living Standards Committee’s report on the external interests of members of Congress since 2018.
This includes changing their code of conduct so that any outside work should be “within reason” and “without preventing them from fully performing” their duties.
The rule will also prohibit members of Congress from accepting paid work as parliamentary strategists, consultants or consultants, as well as accepting compensation or offering employment opportunities as political consultants.
Mr. Johnson said that changing the House of Commons code was “correct parliamentBut he said that he believes these two proposals will become the basis for “a viable method that can win the trust of parliamentarians and the public.”
Owen Patterson was found violating lobbying rules
/ Amplifier lineThe deputy leader of the Labor Party, Angela Rayner, stated that the Labor Party will “ban members of parliament from taking up second jobs” and provide “limited exemptions”.
She wrote on Twitter: “The Labour Party will ban MPs from taking up second jobs, as we have stipulated today, with limited exemptions for public services.
“After voting for corruption, the prime minister turned his back to the wall because we will be forced to vote tomorrow. Let us see him vote for our motion tomorrow.”
Soon after unanimously passing a motion on Tuesday, the prime minister tweeted his proposal, which implemented the government’s U-turn to Irving Patterson.
It canceled the so-called Leadsom Amendment, which was designed to review MP standard investigation procedures in order to postpone Mr. Paterson’s suspension.
It also supports the report of the Standards Committee of the House of Commons that if Mr. Patterson remains a member of Congress, he will be suspended for 30 days.
After the government abandoned attempts to delay suspension and reform standard procedures, Mr. Patterson resigned from his position as a member of Parliament.
On Monday night, as a veteran Sir Torrey, his attempt to quietly support the report on Mr. Patterson’s conduct by the House of Commons Standards Oversight Agency was thwarted. Christopher Joop Against this move.
Theresa May In a debate in parliament on Tuesday, he warned that the despicable behavior caused “damage” to all members of parliament and the parliament.
The former prime minister stated that it is clear that Mr. Patterson, a former congressman, has violated the lobbying rules, and that congressmen tried to save him “with the help and instigation of the government” as “wrong, wrong judgment and totally wrong”.
Ms. May also suggested that the cancellation of the controversial standard reform proposal that triggered the crisis is “a step in the right direction.”
Theresa May Warn of “damage” to everyone Congressman with parliament Vulgar
But she warned that such a move “would not eliminate” the damage caused by the government’s botched attempt to postpone the parliamentary suspension of former Conservative Cabinet Minister Mr. Paterson.
Ms. May told the House of Commons: “Let us be clear, this is not a matter of party politics. All parliamentarians and the entire parliament have been harmed.”
In the report on Mr. Patterson’s behavior, Ms. May, the Conservative Member of Parliament, said: “I believe the conclusion is clear and fair. The rules of propaganda, the procedural reforms to effectively clear his name under cover are wrong, wrong judgments are completely wrong.”
Ms. May said: “It is wrong to think that because someone has violated the rules, the rules are wrong.
“The rule on paid promotion is a long-standing rule.
“The problem arises because someone is trying to effectively let go of the then House of Representatives.
“This runs counter to the rules of paid publicity and the procedures established by the House of Representatives.”
Sir Jeffrey Cox (Stefan Rousseau/PA)
/ PA fileCongressman Maidenhead urged the government to consider how to strengthen the committee’s 2018 recommendations on the standard rules for parliamentarians. Ms. May stated that the broader issue of MPs providing services to their voters is the issue of “their voters”.
Start the standards debate, the leader of the House of Commons, Jacob Bres-Mogg, Expressed “regret” and told members of Congress that an amendment to save Mr. Patterson was a “mistake.”
Mr. Rees-Mogg said: “I think this is just the tragedy that tortured (Owen) Mr. Paterson, which casts a shadow over our judgment, and my judgment is wrong, it’s that simple and sad.”
The leaders of the House of Representatives should consider his position like the Prime Minister, because they need to undermine the Standard Commissioner in order for this stupid and stupid plan to work.
He added: “I regret that the amendment confuses individual cases with more general concerns. This is a mistake.”
But SNP Commons leader Pete Wishart suggested that Mr. Rees-Mogg and Prime Minister Mr. Johnson should consider their positions.
Mr. Wishart criticized the “malicious and malicious attempts” of the parliamentary standards commissioner Kathryn for “destroying and discrediting”. Stone.
Ms. Stone’s investigation found that Mr. Patterson had violated the House of Commons’ code of conduct by lobbying ministers and officials for the two companies and paid him more than £100,000 a year.
Monday, business secretary Quasi Quatten After Stone publicly speculated about her future, he apologized to Ms. Stone.
Mr. Wishart said: “She should not consider her position. House leaders should consider his position like the Prime Minister, because they need to undermine the Standard Commissioner to make this stupid and stupid plan work for them. Of course, it did not work at all. “
The Conservative Christchurch MP, Sir Christopher, said he blocked the motion on Monday night because it is important for the House of Commons to “debate this issue publicly.”
“I have no regrets about it,” he added.
Mr. Patterson’s wife Rose ended her life last year. The former congressman said part of the reason was the investigation of him.
Labor Chris BryantThe Chairman of the Standards Committee said that he believed that the Patterson family had “experienced hell” in the past year, and said: “For me, the parliamentary pranks of the past three weeks can only increase that kind of pain.
“This house is not good for him and his family. We should be ashamed of what happened here, but unfortunately, Mr. Patterson’s bad behavior is not the only catalogue.
“As countless Conservative MPs have told me, by the way, I just want to commend the many new Conservative MPs who have shown greater insight than some of their longer-term colleagues in the past three weeks. The way the Prime Minister handled this matter with the government is shameful, and it makes the House of Representatives notorious.”
When talking about the government’s behavior, Mr. Bryant said: “Completely wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, the government knows this.”
