Just like me Reported in June, Hunter Biden picked up a new racket and made a lot of anonymous money.
He will do “art”, and unidentified people will pay a price that is not available to an untested new artist without a name Biden, estimated to be as high as $500,000.
Now I’m pretty sure, given that it’s Hunter, it can’t be a way of laundering money, bribery or other ways to sell influence, right?I mean just because Joe lied about meeting with Hunter’s business partners in the past Meeting them at the White House, the Vice President’s residence doesn’t mean he will do it again, right?
But then, the White House really intervened. Generally speaking, whenever someone mentions a rough thing Hunter has done, the formulaic reaction of the Democratic Party is “well, he is not in the White House.” This is real. But when the White House was actually involved in Hunter’s deal, yes, they let themselves be involved. When he involved Joe, they were also involved.
The White House formulated and approved an “ethical agreement” for his art exhibition, statement Neither the White House nor Hunter will be told by dealers who the buyer of the artwork is. But remaining anonymous also means that we will not find out who gave Hunter the money. Not telling us who the buyer is will ensure “transparency,” Jen Psaki argues. Ah, what? Hiding the buyer from us equals transparency? Yes, they did say so.
I said how wrong that was-even the Obama ethics czar Walter Schub criticized the White House’s actions. This is also an obvious conflict of laws, and they will own whatever comes from this misfortune because they recognize it. Therefore, they cannot say “But Hunter…” because they have inserted themselves into this mess.
As we discovered today, it didn’t take long to prove that the White House’s rough “deal” was aimed at birds. As we reported earlier, Although the White House has said before, Hunter will meet with potential buyers of his artworks at two art exhibitions. “Gallery owners will not share information about buyers or potential buyers, including their identities, with Hunter Biden or the government, which provides a considerable degree of protection,” White House spokesperson Jen Psaki Once said.
According to reports, Hunter Biden will meet with potential buyers of his artwork https://t.co/ZyL4PEVfUm pic.twitter.com/scshEo8ISj
— New York Post (@nypost) July 22, 2021
But the rough wording does not say that buyers cannot say that they bought art. It does not say that Hunter cannot be found by other means. Now, he is actually meeting with potential buyers, and nothing can stop them from publicly saying, “Hey, I’m buying that over there.” But don’t worry, we are still being kept in the dark. We will not be told.
Even the White House reporter didn’t seem to buy this when questioning Jen Psaki today.
Jen Psaki tried to get Hunter Biden to communicate face-to-face with potential buyers of his artwork:
“Hunter Biden, like any child of the president, should be able to pursue his career and passion.” pic.twitter.com/871FI8U9PW
— Townhall.com (@townhallcom) July 22, 2021
“Children?” Hunter was 51 years old. “Professional?” How does his profession make money, cut 10% to the boss. The “system” they created is the problem. There are more loopholes in this “system” than Swiss cheese. Anyway, this “system” is basically an honor system. We should believe that these people who have been lying to us will not lie and do what they have done in the past.
Another reporter followed up and asked if this was a written agreement, and if so, whether they would publish it. Psaki naturally avoided this question, saying that the agreement was “very clear.” If they don’t have a written form, then anyone can point out even less in the future. Is there anything rough about all this?
Jen Psaki said that we should trust the Biden team’s views on the moral entanglements caused by Hunter Biden’s art.
This is the same strategy they have used in the Biden family for many years, using Joe’s political career for personal gain. pic.twitter.com/G0fnaxh3PR
-Joe Gierut (@Joe_Gierut) July 22, 2021
Yes, it is obvious that this “system” does not provide any protection at all. Anyone can send a large amount of money to Biden’s son, and this “system” will do its best to prevent the public from discovering who is giving them money.
Remember-the highest moral standard ever! Words of Biden!
Asked about HUNTER BIDEN meeting with potential buyers, WH spox @AndrewBatesNC Point out a statement stating that Biden “has established the highest ethical standards of any government in U.S. history, and his family’s commitment to such strict procedures is a good example.” https://t.co/XzsfOrUWCi
— Kenneth P. Vogel (@kenvogel) July 22, 2021
