We have been writing about how bad the Rittenhouse prosecutor’s case is.
But the prosecution’s Lies during today’s shutdown It’s not just unrecognizable. Every lawyer wants to do his best to provide the best case. But this does not mean that you have incorrectly constructed the law or facts to the jury. The first duty of prosecutors is not to win-but to seek justice and truth, even if it means they lose in the process. That is not what we saw in that court today.
However, if ADA Thomas Binger’s closing remarks earlier today were bad and disturbing from a moral point of view—and they were—they might also confuse the jury. They put forward wrong views on the law and facts. Ice tray even tried to justify the provocation at the last minute.In the words of the defense, Binger came to that point. “After their case exploded.” If the jury believes in the ice cube instead of the truth, and is deceived into thinking that it has no right to self-defense because Rittenhouse “angered” Rosenbaum, this may be problematic for the self-defense argument. As we explained before.
The defense did restore a bit of sanity to the end And its arguments, Logically dealt with the whole set of lies the prosecution said, and reminded the jury what it was about—not political or media lies—but the life of a teenager who was hunted down and attacked, and he is now on trial. Because he legally defended himself. They succeeded in pointing out multiple lies of the prosecution—impeaching Bing’s credibility—so if anyone on the jury tends to believe anything Bing’s said during the closing submissions, they can now Seeing that he was not frank with them.
Then the prosecution has the opportunity to refute-which means they can respond and refute what the defence just said in its closing submission. Binger’s prosecution did not end; ADA James Kraus filed a rebuttal. Klaus did not seem to help the case, but put the final stake on the credibility of the prosecutor.
Klaus went on to say that Rittenhouse should somehow try to retreat more. But he tried to retreat. In fact, he was fleeing with all his strength from Joseph Rosenbaum, who tried to hunt him down after threatening to kill him, and Rosenbaum rushed towards him and grabbed his gun. What exactly did the prosecutor want him to do at that moment, and how much can he return?
In the words of the defense, the prosecution was in “Gensokyo.” In addition to more retreats, they also brought up some crazy things, such as before the crazy guy who threatened his life grabbed his gun, he could have shot into the air within that microsecond of Rittenhouse.
Klaus tried to argue that the man who threatened to kill Rittenhouse and grabbed his gun, and the man who pointed the gun at Rittenhouse’s head, Somehow won’t hurt him.
Klaus said: “We should believe that Rosenbaum is Jason Byrne or John Wick, or some other movie star hero who can kill with his bare hands, and deserves the treatment of the defendant.” [….]
Klaus said that Richards tried to make the three victims look like “bad guys are doing bad things.”
“When the defendant is holding a loaded AR-15, we should be very afraid that Mr. Grosskreutz is holding his Glock pistol,” he said.
Yes, Ida Krauss, people are always badly beaten by lunatics like Joseph Rosenbaum. If you think that Glock is unlikely to kill you because it is Glock, I don’t know how to say how ridiculous you are. He pointed it at Rittenhouse’s head. If Rittenhouse hadn’t shot, Rittenhouse might have been dead.
But then Klaus reached the peak of true stupidity. There is no doubt that Klaus left his worst remarks at the end, when he argued that Rittenhouse was a coward, because he did not counter-attack Rosenbaum with his fists, claiming that he carried a gun in a fist fight.
“…He is too timid to use his fists” is one of the worst arguments against self-defense that the prosecution can imagine. However, they used it. pic.twitter.com/mlhCp7fwmY
— Viva Frei (@thevivafrei) November 15, 2021
Here, he opposes all the reality that skateboarding cannot be used as a lethal weapon.Obviously when “hero” When Rittenhouse was lying on the ground, Anthony Huber slammed Rittenhouse on the head with it, which was just a love tap.
🚨🚨Prosecutor James Klaus argued in the closing statement of the Kyle Rittenhouse case that skateboarding cannot be used as a lethal weapon and joked that parents should give their children AR-15 as a Christmas gift pic.twitter.com/NFjG1h8zJO
— Crab Crawler (@crabcrawler1) November 16, 2021
Does Klaus really think the jury will fall because of this? In addition-he admits that his argument is implicitly a threat to Rittenhouse.
In the end, Klaus came to an end and he made an argument that if they were reasonable people, then the jury would think that the prosecution had loopholes. Klaus believes that Rittenhouse should be beaten instead of defending himself. This is indeed distorted. “Everyone gets beaten sometimes, right?” Klaus argued.
🚨Prosecutor James Klaus said seriously (reported)
“Everyone gets beaten occasionally. I don’t need the all-metal jacket AR-15 because of this” about Kyle Rittenhouse. pic.twitter.com/PuGSHyrgpk
— Crab Crawler (@crabcrawler1) November 16, 2021
Oh my goodness. enough. What is the prosecutor’s own name? Kill the father? It doesn’t actually have a name, but now we have to make up one, because that’s what they just did. A clear-eyed jury must watch all this and think they are crazy. Let us only hope that after all this, there is still a clear jury.
