Representative Elise Stefanik (R-NY) has changed a lot from Representative Liz Cheney (R-WY), who is ranked third in the leadership of the Republican Party.
Cheney has shown in the past week why she can really be kicked out of that place and replaced by Stephen Nick.she Supported The dog and pony performance representing House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) is not intended to understand the truth, but to demonize Republicans, Trump and Trump supporters. She has repeatedly stated her prejudice against President Donald Trump. She also worked with Pelosi to expel other Republicans from the committee. Therefore, what we are talking about here is not an impartial view, but a fully partisan committee where everyone already has the same point of view—Pelosi’s point of view.
However, as she explained to Sean Hannity, Stefanik does not have these.
Stefanick calls Cheney “Pelosi’s pawn” pic.twitter.com/Zse7RTxw5C
-Acyn (@Acyn) July 28, 2021
“Speaking of Liz Cheney,” Stefanick told Sean Hannity on his Fox News show on Tuesday night. “She is a Pelosi Republican, and at this point is Pelosi’s pawn. She does not represent the Republican Conference, Republican voters or the American people.”
She also told Hannity that she believed Nancy Pelosi was responsible for not providing adequate security for the Capitol.
“[Republicans] Not focusing on protecting the Speaker of the House of Representatives, he is a lame-duck speaker. We want truth, accountability, and we want to ensure that the U.S. Capitol is safe as the people’s home, and the violence of January 6 will never happen again,” she added.
“Nancy Pelosi is responsible because we know that as early as December, there was information and intelligence that indicated a potential security threat, and the Capitol will not be safe on January 6,” she added.
Although Pelosi tried to put everything under Trump’s feet, Republicans questioned the lack of security during the riots.Rep. Jim Banks Say It was his desire to raise these issues as a member of the committee that made Pelosi an unprecedented move to reject him from the committee.
In February, Republicans raised questions in a letter to Pelosi, as my colleague Jennifer Oliver O’Connell said before Report:
“When the then Chief Sander asked the National Guard for support on January 4, why was the request rejected?” they wrote.
“On January 4, before refusing Chief Sund’s request to send a National Guard, did Armed Sheriff Paul Owen get permission or instructions from your staff?”
They continue to claim that Sander’s request “takes more than an hour” to be approved, which “no doubt includes” Pelosi and her “designated personnel”.
Republicans continue to criticize the Speaker’s decision to fire Irving and demand Sander’s resignation.
They wrote: “These decisions were made in a partisan manner without any consultations with House Republicans, and therefore raise questions about the political motives of your decision.”
Now Stefanik is asking these questions and let Cheney know how you should lead.
