Monday, May 29, 2023
HomeUK NewsThe High Court ruled on the latest round of defamation cases involving...

The High Court ruled on the latest round of defamation cases involving Rebecca Vardy and Corinne Rooney


resistance

Ibica Vardi To find out if she succeeded in getting Colleen Rooney’s defense in the defamation war to be a High court judge.

Mrs Rooney In October 2019, 35-year-old Vardy accused Mrs. Vardy, 39, of leaking “false stories” about her private life after months of “stinging surgery”. She was called “Wagatha Christie” .

The wife of former England star Wayne Rooney publicly claimed that the wife of her football player shared with the newspaper the false story she posted on her personal Instagram account, earning her the nickname “Vagatha Christie”.

Rebecca Vardy / PA file

Mrs. Vardy, who is married to Leicester City forward Jamie Vardy, denied the allegations and sued Mrs. Rooney for libel.

In the latest round of cases, Mrs. Vardy’s lawyer asked the High Court to dismiss part of Mrs. Rooney’s defense, including allegations that Mrs. Vardy was closely related to her. sun And she claimed but denied that she was the author of the “The Secret Wag” column.

Judge Steyn will deliver his verdict at 10:30 am on Wednesday.

At the June hearing, Hugh Tomlinson QC believed that these were “irrelevant or irrelevant” to the case, and the core question was whether Mrs. Vardy had leaked Mrs. Rooney’s Instagram posts.

Mr. Tomlinson stated in a written statement that most of the claims made by Mrs. Rooney’s lawyers were controversial and rejected.

He continued: “Even if it is determined that the claimant has a’particularly close relationship’ with The Sun, it gives her a positive report that she has a history of self-promotion or is a’secret swingman’, but it does not mean The plaintiff is likely to regularly inform the “Sun” of the defendant’s private posts.”

Manchester Arena Boxing / PA file

Mr. Tomlinson later emphasized that these two women have public images and their own relationships with the media.

He said: “What happened in this case is that the defendant has passed the plaintiff’s appearance in the newspaper and put two and two together to make seven.”



Source link

RELATED ARTICLES

Most Popular

Recent Comments