At this point, for any neo-free media coverage of President Donald Trump, one must adopt the 48-hour rule.
The free media panic about this. Then more facts start to surface, where you see that it is really not what they reported, and/or the media has distorted something to express something different from the original intention.
We have seen this pattern time and time again. However, they are still using it-people are still falling for it.
Friday, The New York Times Published a story Claiming that even if Trump was told by the DOJ that there was no evidence to support fraud, he told them only to say that the election was corrupt.
But this is not what happened, and the order of speaking is important, as lawyer Margot Cleveland first pointed out.
If you look at the minutes of the meeting between Acting Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen and Deputy Attorney General Richard Donohue (assuming these records are accurate), Donahoe is talking about checking whether Pennsylvania voted More questions than voters.
5/ This part is at the end of the article: pic.twitter.com/EYFXqFXsrV
— Margot Cleveland (@ProfMJCleveland) July 30, 2021
Then, if you look at the notes, you will see Trump’s response to this part-which means that they have not yet come to a conclusion on the fraud issue. A very important difference. Trump also stated that he did not want them to change the election results, only that the election was corrupt. Another very important observation.
The published notes (if accurate) reveal @New York Times Fake news again: pic.twitter.com/42KiprQeU5
— Margot Cleveland (@ProfMJCleveland) July 30, 2021
So, what the notes seem to be saying is that if they find something (fraud/election problems), just say that you found the problem (“corruption”) and Trump will start from there. You can’t get a complete understanding from the notes. However, Trump specifically told them that he did not want them to change the results. Therefore, he specifically said something contrary to what the New York Times suggested. It only makes sense if they find a problem. If they do not find fraud, but say there is fraud, that is “change the outcome.” Therefore, he did not ask them to do this, as he himself said.
However, this is why the comment was removed from the context of the Pennsylvania issue and implied that it was dishonest after they told Trump that they found nothing, and changed the nature of what was actually said.
It’s like the telephone controversy in Georgia Terribly distorted into something it is not, The media and Democrats tried to suggest that Trump pressure Georgia officials when he (and his lawyers) had a legal conference call with them—just told them to investigate the allegations.
