We have been reporting on the Rittenhouse trial, and I want to weigh the decision to have Kyle Rittenhouse testify.
In general, this is not a good idea, especially considering the progress of the trial and the implosion of the control plan. Even though he may be innocent, this does not mean that the prosecutor cannot distort what he may say or lead him to say something that may be harmful to the jury.
Now, I understand why the defensive side would do this. Rittenhouse might insist on testifying. They knew he was innocent and would provide convincing witnesses. This is of course true. He is a good witness, and he refuted the prosecutor’s many efforts. If the jury is honest, fearless and thinks clearly, they should see this.
But this is a bigger problem, which is why if I represent him, I would not do it.
Tucker Carlson captured it in his summary of what happened in today’s case. That is to say-they are not fair, and the case involved the media and politicians from the beginning.
The prosecution should care not about victory or politics, but about justice, even if the truth hurts the case. But this is not what we see. As the judge pointed out, we saw multiple cases of improper conduct by the prosecutor on Wednesday-first commenting on Kyle’s silence, although he has the right to remain silent, and then trying to obtain evidence that the judge has ruled against it.The judge said that the prosecutor Thomas Binger committed Serious violation of the constitution By drawing negative inferences about Rittenhouse’s use of his right to remain silent and the judge to remain silent That he didn’t believe the prosecutor out of goodwill When he tried to obtain evidence that the judge ruled out.
There are many people there From media to politician They are weighing the pros and cons, attacking Rittenhouse, not caring about the facts, only thinking about how to help their political agenda. They don’t care about actual facts or testimony, so if you think letting him testify can convince them to understand, and it will help him in the future—they don’t care about the truth. No matter what he said, they would think it was wrong, as we have seen. They don’t want to give up the vision of the evil white supremacist militia boy who crossed state boundaries with his huge gun and hunted down poor protesters on the streets—the outright lies they incited. It doesn’t matter if it has nothing to do with reality.
In my opinion, the defense should leave it where it was last night-as the control plan broke and Motion for targeted judgment. Now, maybe they haven’t filed that motion because they got some signs from the judge that he really didn’t want to take the case from the jury.However, after today, judges criticizing the actions of the prosecution may have some different feelings about this and the motion actually put forward by the defense. This is for the sake of The prejudiced trial failed, This means that the prosecution cannot re-file the lawsuit.
But this is a case that should never be started because it is so obvious self-defense. Across the country, you have all kinds of actual violent BLM/Antifa riots, but have not been prosecuted, but here you have legitimate self-defense actions, but being treated like this, the media and Democratic politicians begin to crush a 17-year-old child.
Carlson made this point in a major breakdown of the case. His description of first-person shooting—Joseph Rosenbaum—is a description in the book.
He also talked about Nathan DeBruin’s testimony, namely We mentioned before This just hollowed out the prosecution-De Bruyne replied to ADA James Klaus said yes, the prosecution tried to get him to change his statement-more allegedly an improper prosecution. Carlson reminds us that the media and power not only hunt Rittenhouse but also ordinary citizens who dare to provide support to Rittenhouse. Because of their donation in support of Rittenhouse, a police lieutenant in Virginia lost his job, and another man had the media appear at his home and called his employer.
The trial should not be about politics, it should be about the law and the facts of the case.But in the following time, politicians and the media From Joe Biden on down inappropriately politicized this case to serve their dangerous agenda about the evil white supremacists. All this exploded, but they still rejected reality.
