As we reported earlier, Jen Psaki acknowledged that the Biden administration is flagging people with misinformation to Facebook.She also said that those Banned on one platform should be banned on all other social media platforms She talked about 12 people who are the biggest spreaders of “misinformation” about the Wuhan coronavirus.
Peter Dusey then hit her with one important question About what the government is doing to view people’s Facebook profiles or such a list of 12 people? This is a very important question. Who makes the government the decision maker of “misinformation”? What gives them the right to censor information they disagree by trying to force Facebook to shut down people? Not to mention putting the target behind the 12 people in question.
When the government intervenes, it raises constitutional issues (if Facebook operates under the requirements of the state, it may make Facebook a “state actor”).
Now, the media should pay attention to the government’s attempts to conduct censorship.
But, as we saw last night, CNN’s Jake Tapper Actually tried to rotate this As a question of Peter Doocy, he believes that the “espionage” of the Biden administration on Facebook’s personal data is wrong.
The talking point must have disappeared, because the Washington Post also raised the same topic, trying to put it on Doocy in some way — not about the actual question he raised: why the government tried to pressure Facebook to shut down people?
Fox News made embarrassing “spy” mistake in the White House briefing roomhttps://t.co/oORUMR6GcI
-Aaron Blake (@AaronBlake) July 16, 2021
They wanted to question his use of the word “spy” on his Facebook profile, but they completely deviated from using such a list-no matter where it came from-to mark people with greater meaning.
They could not refute what she said.
Psaki: About 12 people created 65% of anti-vaccine misinformation on social media platforms.Although some of them are banned on other platforms (including those owned by Facebook), all of them remain active on Facebook pic.twitter.com/GCyFPUOkqK
-Acyn (@Acyn) July 15, 2021
But since the Washington Post is going to discuss the source of this list, let’s talk about it. As WaPo admits, The list she quoted seemed to be “False information 12“——From the Center for Countering Digital Hatred, an international group headquartered in the United Kingdom with an office in Washington
NBC News Talk about the research of CCDH Used by Google to act against federalists and zero hedges. NBC stated that they are tracking websites that talk about the BLM movement. Google stated that they had problems with the Federalist’s comment section, not the post.
I am very happy that @SFFakeNews and @NBC_VC And @AMFraserNBC, have successfully convinced @Google Stop ads from appearing on Zero Hedge and The Federalist. @CCDHateThe biggest victory ever. https://t.co/ur0E50DwWF
— Imran Ahmed (@Imi_Ahmed) June 16, 2020
How is this CCDH described their work:
The work of the center combines the analysis and active destruction of these networks. CCDH’s solution seeks to increase the economic, political, and social costs of all parts of the infrastructure (participants, systems, and culture) that support hatred and misinformation and often profit from hatred and misinformation.
Solutions such as Stop funding fake news It has been proven to be effective in eliminating the coverage of websites that pretend to be real news but actually contain conspiracy theories, misinformation and propaganda, mixed with bad news. [….]
CCDH also forces social media companies to set a precedent and eliminate hate or dangerous speech by holding them directly responsible for their tolerance of hate content.
Facts have proved that the center’s solution can effectively deal with many different types of hatred and misinformation, such as identity-based hatred, denial of climate change, and health misinformation. The goal is to develop feasible, efficient and scalable strategies and tactics to combat hatred and misinformation on a global scale.
So, the White House is using such groups to track what people consider to be “fake news”? “Propaganda?” Or even “deny climate change?”
In an attempt to evade allegations of “spy”, WaPo inadvertently highlighted another problem. What happened, and when will the White House use or cite such groups?
