Dear fellow white people,
It’s me, your confused prince and unofficial black community ambassador, Scott.
man! Kyle Rittenhouse!What verdict! It’s not that any of us doubt this is coming, but it’s nice to see that the world has not completely gone crazy. Of course, we can all feel that we are worried about the events of Kenosha that night, while still collectively relieved that the jury did the right thing.
You might expect that many leftists will continue to insist on their failed narrative of what happened that night. No, Kyle did not cross state boundaries with a gun. No, Kyle didn’t go there to kill anyone. No, AR-15 is not a “weapons of war”. There is enough nonsense in this case to last our lives. If you expect this piece to become some handheld kumbaya, it will not happen. For those who have turned it into the left side of a bunch of things that it is not, let them own it. Let them know that the narrative of their failure has hurt many people, including those they claim to help. However, calling Rittenhouse a “white supremacist” or suggesting that the judgment is related to race is a complete lie. this The verdict did not. Of course, this feels like justice to us, but we can understand why this may be unfair to others. When we watch the trial, we all know it will be the result, But if Kyle is black And facing the challenges faced by young blacks in our justice system, first, he may never raise funds to support Kyle’s defense, and second, he will never get the support of conservatives like Kyle.
That’s why I wrote this letter. Our criminal justice approach requires some nuances, and I think we don’t apply it frequently enough.although this The verdict has nothing to do with race, many of which are related to race. Our lack of support for the victims of our “justice” system makes us no better than the people who carried out the operation in the first place. In most cases, when there is a shooting incident that attracts national attention, we will look at our corners, see their reactions, and then decide what we think about it. We don’t need to remind us of what the media tells us to be angry about. When we react in our own way, we need to pay attention to how many of these emotions and reactions are created by media influence. Take George Floyd as an example…you can think of Floyd whatever you want. He may be a drug addict and a crappy person all day long, and you can think of him as a problematic example of the leftist anti-police movement. However, these things did not justify killing him. Yes, I heard annoying arguments about fentanyl in his system, of course, this may have been a contributing factor (or even a major factor) leading to his death. However, when there is a video of a policeman, stomping frantically outside of etiquette or necessity, kneeling on a man’s neck for more than eight and a half minutes, it’s a little hard to talk about. In fact, most of you are more angry at Colin Kaepernick kneeling for the national anthem than at Derek Shawn kneeling on George Floyd’s neck. If Xiao Wan follows the policy and treats Freud with professional respect, there is no guarantee that Freud is still alive, but one thing is certain: Xiao Wan will never be suspected of killing him, and the left will never again. There is their narrative firepower.
On Breonna Taylor, many of you care more about who her boyfriend is than what actually happened that night. Nothing, I’ll say it again… Nothing, Breonna Taylor did prove that the police knocked on her door in the middle of the night and killed her. No… A… thing… Yes, I know there are conflicting statements about whether the police announced their intentions. Whether it is announced or not, what is it that officials are required to wear plain clothes and vests without any identifying characteristics in the middle of the night? Why did they not wear the body camera they released? I can tell you one thing for sure: if my door is kicked down by a gunman in the middle of the night, and they do not identify myself, I will also shoot. I mean, half of you have thrown the acquittal of Andrew Café IV before the left in order to refute the “racism” statement in Rittenhouse’s verdict. On the surface, what is the difference between Coffee case and Breonna Taylor? The answer is: no. Use it to get political points, otherwise you will put it in the same column as Taylor, which is almost all the exploitation you can get.
This does not mean that all shootings or deaths in the hands of the police are bad. It is reasonable to prevent shooting that poses an imminent danger to the police or the public. Rayshard Brooks is a good example. The police contacted Brooks after Brooks fainted in Wendy’s drive-thru in Atlanta. When the police tried to arrest Brooks on the grounds of DUI, Brooks tried to escape and ended up in a wrestling match with two police officers, taking a police officer’s taser in the process. When Brooks began to run away, he turned and pointed the Taser at the officer he had taken away, leaving him with only one way to defend himself: his military gun. This is exactly what he did, shooting Brooks twice. Two police officers immediately performed first aid and cardiopulmonary resuscitation, trying to save Brooks’ life. Should Brooks die because he passed out in his car or wrestled with the police? Do not. However, when he turns and threatens to use potentially lethal and incapacitating force on the officer, the officer has every right to immediately eliminate the pending threat.
It’s the same with Michael Brown. Brown’s fingerprints were found in the police officer’s car and on the gun. He showed the intention of hurting the police officer, he showed the intention of taking the gun, so in this case, the police officer has every right to eliminate the direct threat to his life.
So what is the meaning of fellow white people? It’s not that we have to create a smart label or march for justice (you can, as I did in the case of Breonna Taylor). No, you don’t have to. Just before resorting to the standard ideological corner, we need to start checking the facts of the case and the situation. “Whoever it is, support blue” is not us, especially when we know what power our law enforcement agencies have in the United States. When police officers act within their scope of work and show restraint and professionalism in contact with suspects, we should immediately show respect (and gratitude). However, if we know that a police officer’s behavior violates the code of conduct, we should first request the dismissal of the police officer, and if he or she breaks the law in the process, then prosecute him or her to the fullest extent of the law.
So how do we show that we have a prudent and meticulous approach to these things? In the case of Ahmaud Arbery, we now have an excellent opportunity. Here, we have a 25-year-old kid who goes for a jog. He is a place where a group of white people think he shouldn’t go. Did Arbery get their attention because he is black? Yes. If Abery is white, could he still be alive? Also, yes. Abery’s crime? Looking at a house under construction, I, a white man, have done it many times. Abery continued jogging after watching, but was contacted by two vehicles and three men armed with guns. One of the men, Travis McMichael, immediately aimed a shotgun at Abery, and the two started fighting. McMichael killed Abery. Does McMichael have the right to point a gun at Abery? Do not. If he pointed a gun at me, I would probably also try to take the gun from him. In this case, what happened here was undoubtedly murder, and in my opinion, it was obviously racially motivated. (Especially considering McMichael’s Use the N word freely Standing by Abery when he died suuuuper racist social media posts.)
Yes, Kyle Rittenhouse did justice to Kyle Rittenhouse. But we need to remember that it does not serve the thousands of Americans from the country’s major minority communities every day. It is not enough to cheer or use it as a blunt weapon to deal with clown liberals such as the seal pups on the driving range. When injustice does happen, we need to stand up first and demand action to immediately stop and/or correct the said injustice. Be sensitive to the fact that you may not fully understand all the facts, and are willing to form alliances with our friends and neighbors who are slightly darker than us.
We have done a lot of work to show the black community that as conservatives, we represent the ideal that can give them the best future. We can point out policies that have a negative impact on these communities and show that they are mainly made by the left. We can remove as many of these obstacles as possible. However, just because we are better at communication does not mean that we cannot do more. This is why we should constantly strive to ensure that every American can receive the same justice as Kyle, regardless of their skin color.Our message must be simple: we are with you, we are your ally, fighting against you all injustice.
Your master of alabaster,
Scott Hensel
