It was probably Celeste Wallander, the former National Security Council staff member of The One, and her smile revealed this.Maybe the reason she smiles these days is because she is Nominator of the hologram Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Affairs.
Biden and Russian expert Celeste Wallander formed his Pentagon team https://t.co/yKfY0y2XRI
-Axios (@axios) June 22, 2021
Calling it a rewarding journey for outstanding work is another renovation of Obama’s hologram system.
Let us explore the evidence.
First of all, please recall that the leak of Flynn’s “Russian contact” to the media in January 2017 was a spark that triggered the frenzied feeding of the Democratic media complex and led to the manipulated Mueller Special Counsel (They are all democrats) And when Mueller’s clown could not produce conclusive evidence, the first impeachment failed.Of course, no, because we now know that “file” is just a copy The dirty tricks of the Democratic Party concocted by the Shrillary campaign team and others. It is also important to understand that the person who leaked the information is a felon. As pointed out here:
Attorney Sol Wisenberg said that the official responsible for divulging information about the investigation of retired Lieutenant General Michael Flynn should be charged with a felony for his actions.
“When you expose an official who shouldn’t be exposed, then leak confidential materials and leak Kislyak-Flynn’s phone number to the media, it’s disrespect for the law. This is a felony and carries a statutory maximum penalty of 10 years. “Weissenberg said, referring to Flynn’s contact with Russia’s special envoy Sergey Kislyak during the presidential transition.
When the clues are still hot and at least a few people are interested in finding the mouse, the traditional media is full of speculation about all common suspects-Susan Rice, Sally Yates, James Clapper, John Bu Lennan, James Comey, etc. These names are intended to mislead the real culprit (one of the main functions of traditional media is to fabricate narratives and hide the Democratic Party’s treachery). Who didn’t tell you? Celeste Ann Varand, President and CEO of the US-Russia Foundation, former Special Assistant to the President and Senior Director of the National Security Council for Russia/Eurasian Affairs (2013-2017), and former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Russia/Ukraine/Eurasian Affairs (2009) to 2012 July). She has a lot of Democratic street credibility and has held two different senior positions for Obama!
Varand is a Russian expert on Obama’s National Security Council. Oh, by the way, Fiona Hill and Celeste Wallander are old friends. You remember Fiona, don’t you?her Twisted trap weasel wording testimony During Trump’s second impeachment. KT McFarlaneFlynn’s former deputy national security adviser spoke with Fiona on December 29, just before General Flynn called the Russian ambassador to the United States Sergey Kislyak. For details, see New Yorker (Emphasis added below). That article also revealed a very interesting Wallander-Hill breakfast conversation:
[Hill] She did not seek a position in the new government, but she was “willing to advise anyone who shows up and offers me two cents.” McFarlane called Hill on the afternoon of December 29, 2016, asking her about her views on the Obama administration’s recent sanctions against Russia in retaliation for Putin’s interference in the electionHill urged McFarlane to avoid treating them as “political issues”; she said they were just “appropriate actions.”
…
Old acquaintances also pressured Hill to change her mind. On March 8, before Hill met her staff for the first time, she had breakfast with Celeste Varand at the Blue Duck Tavern near Georgetown. Varand served as Obama’s White House adviser on Russia, and she and Hill have been in contact for more than two decades. Varand said there is clear evidence that Trump and his circle members coordinated with the Russians. Trump’s recent attacks then Because “outdated” indicates that he intends to do whatever Putin wants to do. To work in the Trump administration is to endorse its policies. “You can’t be faulty,” Varand said. “You can’t say,’Well, I don’t support that.’ You have these policies, even if you disagree with them internally.” Hill was not convinced. He told Varand that the government still needs to “do nothing about Putin.” “Fantasy” advisers to prevent Russia’s future election interference. “When your house is on fire, you have to go in and save something,” she said.
According to the Mueller report and This Fox News article, Flynn called Michael Reading (Flynn’s co-author) Battlefield: How do we win the global war against radical Islam and its allies And former National Security Council adviser) just before calling Kislyak. But we were never informed of the call between KT McFarland and Fiona Hill (Fox also confused it).
As “Special Assistant to the President and Senior Director of the National Security Council for Russia and Eurasian Affairs,” Varand will be eligible to become a “Senior U.S. Government Official” as defined by David Ignatius of The Washington Post. Who was the recipient of Flynn’s leak and broke the story. Flynn-Kislyak’s transcript will definitely appear on her desk. How else can Varand claim that there is “clear evidence” that Trump’s team “coordinated with the Russians” in his conversation with McFarlane?
Many Democrats think Victoria Newland And Celeste Wallander, two of Obama’s top Russian experts, tried to “warn everyone” and provide a “solution”: Vladimir Putin. Always “fired” and “marginalized” by the new president, Varand had to leak secrets to Ignatius to “get Trump” because he was “obviously compromised by Putin” – or “controlled” , As the Democratic Party’s narrative later became.
This is Valander’s “frank and comprehensive interview with Putin and allegations of Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. election-all part of the 2018 Putin File” (part of the Democrat Media Echo Chamber report aimed at impeaching Tron President Prussian). Watch that interview and tell me she is not obsessed with getting Trump:
35:10-Discussion shifts to elections
51:44-“What are the options?” (start watching here)
52:31-Implementation of sanctions and Russian retaliation plan
53:38-“And we were very surprised-I was surprised to find out that they would not do anything the next day.”
53:50-“This is puzzling.”
Since Fiona Hill’s prompts and the FBI’s routine surveillance of Kislyak revealed his conversation with Flynn, we can safely assume that her confusion is short-lived.
There are some things…
Fiona Hill probably reminded old friend Celeste Wallander about Flynn-Kislyak’s transcript, who then reported the matter to David Ignatius. Although Varand will see the transcript/intelligence report, her “leaks” will be considered legitimate by (some people) because her source is Fiona Hill, not the intelligence community.
Fiona Hill may be Adam Entous’s source of “whispering” the Flynn-Kislyak call.From Fox News (Emphasize):
However, Ignatius is not the only person in the newspaper who has communication information. Washington Post reporter Adam Entus stated at the 2018 Georgetown Legal Panel Discussion, “Sources started whispering to me that all these mysterious communications Between Michael Flynn (then Trump’s national security adviser) and Russian ambassador Kislyak.
According to Entus, the information caused “disagreements within the news editorial department.”
On Sunday, Twitter user Techno Fog discovered for the first time a transcript of Entous’s speech in Georgetown. The user extensively reported on Trump’s investigation with Russia.
“Initially, I didn’t know what to do,” Entous said. “There are disagreements in the newsroom. At that time, I was in the Washington Post… Why is Michael Flynn talking to the Russian ambassador as news? He should talk to the Russian ambassador. For example, he should talk to him about saving Aleppo. Children. He has no reason not to have that conversation. I argued internally that we need more than just the fact of dialogue, but I am one of many journalists.”
Interestingly, Barack Obama knew about Flynn Kislyak’s call before Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates! Celeste Wallander may be the source of this information (most likely through Susan Rice).From Fox News (Emphasize):
President Obama knew the details of the phone call with then-Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak intercepted in December 2016 by then-incoming National Security Adviser Michael Flynn, which apparently made the then Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates Surprised, According to documents released on Thursday, as evidence of the government’s motion to dismiss the Flynn case.
…
On January 5, 2017, Yates attended the Oval Office meeting According to the newly declassified documents, including a FD-302 FBI witness report, the then FBI Director James Comey, the then Vice President Joe Biden, the then CIA Director John Brennan and the then National Intelligence Agency Director James Clapper. They discussed Russian interference in the election with the National Security Advisor Susan Rice and other members of the National Security Council.
After the briefing, Obama asked Yates and Comey to “stay” and stated that he “knows about Flynn” and his conversation with the Russian ambassador on sanctions. Obama “made it clear that he does not want any additional information on this matter, but is seeking information about whether the White House should treat Flynn differently based on this information.”
A previous memo from Rice stated that Biden also stayed after the main briefing.
At the time, the file said, “Yates didn’t know what the president was talking about, but he figured it out based on the conversation. Yates recalled that Comey mentioned the “Logan Act”, but couldn’t remember whether he indicated that there was an “investigation.” Comey did not talk about prosecution at the meeting. “
The exhibition continues: “Yates did not know where the President received the information for the first time. Yates can’t remember Comey’s response to the President’s question about how to treat Flynn. She was so surprised by the information she heard that it was difficult for her to deal with And listen to the conversation at the same time.
All in all, the flow of information is likely to go from McFarland to Hill to Valland.Once in the White House, it went from Walland to Rice to Obama (and Ignatius).
Bottom line: Because of her senior position and experience, Varand has strong anti-Trump sentiments, motivations, approaches and credibility-she has everything. She is a leaker. Prove me wrong.
Will any Republicans interviewing her during her Senate confirmation process directly ask Varand a few questions about this? How does a simple question highlight that her view of President Trump and Russia is so wrong (which exposes her “professional knowledge”)? Don’t hold your breath, but in this new era of grassroots activism, you may want to put pressure on your senator beforehand.
the end.
