Beginning in June last year, RedState began to report inconsistent science and data from China on the origin of SARS-CoV-2, which caused the COVID-19 pandemic and has now claimed the lives of more than 600,000 Americans. Immediately, mainstream media and big technology began to propagate on behalf of the Chinese government, saying that even if they question the origin of SARS-CoV-2, they are participating in racist conspiracy theories.For months, when we published articles mentioning that topic, we were threatened, even if a word was marked as “Fact checkers” like Peter Daszak.
Fortunately, Senator Rand Paul Renewed debate about the origin of SARS-CoV-2 In May, he cross-examined Dr. Anthony Fauci at a Senate hearing.Within a few days, a group of famous virologists Published a letter It is stated that the World Health Organization’s “investigation” is not enough and that the laboratory leak theory should be reinvestigated. It was only then that our benevolent media and technology overlords decided that we could approach this subject again, and they also began investigating the matter to find out what we have always known: laboratory leak theory is not only possible, but possible.
From NPR:
“The head of the World Health Organization admitted that it is too early to rule out the potential link between the COVID-19 pandemic and laboratory leaks. He said on Thursday that he asked China to be more transparent as scientists search for the origin of the coronavirus. .. “
you do not say! ? This article published today contains a statement made yesterday by WHO Director-General Ghebreyesus, but it did not mention the fact that Ghebreyesus made a similar statement in May, which we reported in RedState at the time. Ghebreyesus found that, given the laboratory leak theory, reports on the origin of COVID-19 are severely lackingThis report was partly produced with the help of Dr. Peter Daszak and only 4 pages out of nearly 400 pages were used to introduce the potential of laboratory leakage theory.
One of the issues that bothered the WHO to conduct a thorough investigation is the lack of transparency of the Chinese government’s investigation of investigators. The WHO team was under strict military escort throughout the entire process in China and lacked the autonomy to conduct thorough investigations. In fact, all the data used to analyze the origin was provided by the Chinese government to the World Health Organization. The WHO team does not have the ability to collect its own data.
“WHO Director-General Tan Desai has rarely deviated from his usual respect for powerful member states. He stated that obtaining raw data has always been a challenge for the international team that went to China to investigate the source of COVID-19 earlier this year. .. “
Such obvious inconsistencies in the data even led to random news behaviors committed by people in the Washington Post. Last week, they questioned the data of the first batch of cases from Wuhan, indicating that these people had no contact in the vegetable market. According to Daszak, lead researcher Dr. Shi Zhengli and others, this is the so-called source of the virus at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Due to their problems, the WHO agreed to revise their report to indicate that the first case of the virus is related to the market.
From Wabo:
A WHO spokesperson later clarified that although the first case had nothing to do with the fresh food market, the first case was probably not the first.
Although it is certainly correct to see that this story may eventually be told, it is frustrating that only certain approved media members are allowed to be the people who tell it. Our report on this information is clear and true from the first day. Our source of information is wrong, and now the media is chasing our reports, acting as if it is brand new and destructive information.
RedState is still waiting for NIH to release our FOIA information.Please stay tuned for the latest news of this story as it continues to unfold
