Kyle Rittenhouse’s lawyer Mark Richards said at a press conference after the trial ruling was announced that he would not participate in any civil lawsuits that Rittenhouse might bring. Don’t worry, I believe that when the time is right, Rittenhouse will have a large number of top civil rights lawyers ready to accept this.
Since 2019, we have not seen such media misconduct and serious due process abortion. At that time Nicholas Sandman Accused of harassing a Native American who was actually harassing him. Under the leadership of the CNN hackers, they aimed and tried to destroy the teenage boy’s life. After Sandman won his unprecedented settlement with CNN and others*, you would think that traditional media would learn a lesson, but obviously not.
Since August 26, 2020, we have seen traditional media and elected officials — everyone should know them better — lining up to serve as Kyle Rittenhouse’s judge, jury, and executioner before the case goes to trial !
No matter what Kyle Rittenhouse chooses to do, he has the material to bring a civil lawsuit against many people. Wired legal analysts and the person in charge of the conversation said that due to the public nature of the conduct and trial, defamation and libel may not be an option. However, slandering, aiming and gaslighting just to put your thumb on the scale of justice is a terrible choice, and too many people have made this choice without thinking.
For now, the following is a short list of people Kyle Rittenhouse might consider prosecuting.
Who should Kyle sue first?
-Eric Spracklen🇺🇸 (@EricSpracklen) November 19, 2021
1. Joey Reid.
My colleague Nick Arama said All right:
“There are a lot of despicable shots, but I believe that MSNBC’s Joy Reid can always find a way to try to reach for that brass ring.”
When she grasped the ring, it might be green. Joey Reid Her racially charged abuse is disgusting. People also want to know her mental and emotional state. It is unhealthy to focus on racism and “white supremacy” under every stone.
Reid exudes the stench of bloodthirsty, complacency, and knight privilege. You can see it in her eyes. Every time she talks about “white vigilance”, she is very happy, calling Rittenhouse a “proud boy fan” and repeating the blatant lie about Rittenhouse taking AR-15 across state lines. Her words and her distorted similarities with Brett Kavanaugh and George Zimmerman are intentional to hurt this young man.Like Reza Aslan and his Poorly conceived tweets Regarding Nicholas Sandman, Reid is responsible for her actions.
2. Microsoft National Broadcasting Corporation
Then there are Reid’s bosses at MSNBC, who seem to be happy to hire noisy employees. What is the use of comparing a person on trial to a “school shooter”? The MSNBC think tank believes that it is perfectly possible for their moderators to use terms such as “murder” and “vigilance”, as if this were true.
This is just a sample:
Now, the cherry on the sundae is the organization commissioned by a “freelancer” to follow the bus to take the jury members away from the court and take pictures.
Completely shiny.
My colleague Bunch Report,
The questionable MNSBC reporter followed the jury bus and tried to take photos of them. He even ran a red light while doing so, and there was absolutely no reason to do so, unless the goal was to get MSNBC to target them eventually, which would almost certainly lead to their exposure. If the verdict is not established, those jurors will be in real danger.
NBC News stated that Morrison was a freelancer for the organization, but denied that he tried to contact the jury or film the jury. The network added that they regretted the incident. The big question now is: Why run the red light behind the jury bus? What is the urgency? https://t.co/bRdqDXMJzW
— Joe Concha (@JoeConchaTV) November 18, 2021
Judge Bruce Schroeder was right to ban MSNBC from entering the courtroom. Decades ago, they were no longer a “news” organization, and their reports showed this. Litigation may weaken the little credibility (if any) or market share they still maintain.
3. Daily beast.
Whether it’s a “report” or a review article, Daily Beast Kyle Rittenhouse has been referred to as “notorious”, “gun-bearing,” “juvenile killer,” and other words that evoke the image of Rittenhouse. These words have never been reported or tried. Confirmation of the facts presented in.
The slander of the Daily Beast: https://t.co/9PUu1rjNK2 pic.twitter.com/uc5qpCyYM4
-John Gravino (@john_gravino) November 19, 2021
4. President Joe Biden.
It’s a lot like President Obama weighing the pros and cons when arresting his friend Dr. Henry Louis Gates, calling the Cambridge police “behaving stupid.”
It’s just that the situation is worse. Gates was arrested on suspicion of trespassing; Rittenhouse faces murder charges. Therefore, the then presidential candidate Joe Biden weighed the pros and cons, calling Rittenhouse a white supremacist, in order to increase his sincerity in racial reconciliation and show himself as a unity. It transcends paleness.
The current president, @乔拜登, Calling Rittenhouse a white supremacist without evidence.
I want to stop and take this point home: The most powerful man on the planet used his influence and authority to slander a teenager who is facing false, politically-driven allegations. pic.twitter.com/Qjt7sSGD7S
— Drew Holden (@DrewHolden360) November 19, 2021
Now that the verdict has been delivered and Rittenhouse has been found not guilty, President Joe Biden has decided to provide a tedious statement without even mentioning his statement made more than a year ago:
Biden issued a statement on Rittenhouse before leaving the White House to seek pardon from Turkey
“Although the Kenosha judgment will make many Americans, including me, angry and worried, we must admit that the jury has spoken.” pic.twitter.com/WM4OhgPNga
— Charlie Spearing (@charliespiering) November 19, 2021
There is no apology to Kyle Rittenhouse, and no lie about his promise to “keep the Americans together.” You know this response is in a can, unlike the first one who judged Kyle Rittenhouse without evidence.
It’s time for Dementia Joe to eat some ice cream. FLOTUS Jill can worry about the upcoming litigation.
As the judgment is finalized and time goes by, legal and media personnel will make a list and check it twice. When it comes to traditional media reports and comments on the Rittenhouse trial, everyone is naughty.
*UPDATE, 11-19-2021: Corrected Nicholas Sandmann's settlement amount to remove the dollar amount, as this was undisclosed.
