When Bezerkeley Congresswoman Buffy Wicks (D-Climber) submitted her AB455: “Vaccine Verification Act” until 2022, Californians temporarily escaped.
Press release from Wicks:
On Monday, Asm. Wicks announced that she will shelve its proposed vaccine validation bill until 2022 before the state legislature to allow more time to develop the strongest possible policy and provide additional stakeholder cooperation.
According to the proposal, the bill will require all employers, including the public and private sectors, to require all employees who are eligible to be vaccinated to present a vaccination certificate or to conduct a COVID-19 test once a week. Assemble Wicks will continue to work with Senator Richard Penn (D-Sacramento), Asm, and continue to study the language of the proposed bill when entering the next legislative session. Akilah Weber, MD (D-San Diego), Asm. Evan Low (D-Silicon Valley), Senator Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco), and Senator Josh Newman (D-Fullerton).
Translation: Wicks knows that Governor Gavin “Hair Gel” Newsom is in deep trouble. If he is recalled, any Republican governor will veto the bill and send it to the circular file to which it belongs. Just like this super-majority Democratic parliament is as corrupt and evil, they will find a way to stuff it into another bill or a group of bills, just like they ruined a traffic bill in order to create this bill. The only bastion of this kind of nonsense is a governor who pays attention to the Constitution, and votes for her and the other clowns mentioned above, who will step down in 2022.
FYI, Senator Scott Weiner (D-Pedarist Enabler) is an introduction SB145 In the California legislature, the legislation was passed into law in September 2020. The law allows the age of consent to include a 10-year gap; this means that if an 8-year-old child is raped by an 18-year-old man, the 18-year-old child will not be regarded as a sex offender and does not need to be registered as a sex offender . It is signed by the Governor’s Hairspray.
So, they all need to go.
Now, at the local level, cities can still choose to develop their own vaccine verification tasks. This is what New York City did. The shocking Los Angeles City Council was behind them, working hard to draft the language for their own tasks. However, as soon as the news came out, the people of Los Angeles did not accept it well.
From Hill:
On Sunday, opponents of vaccine authorization showed up at the homes of two Los Angeles lawmakers to protest.
Chairman of the City Council Nuri Martinez Mitch O’Farrell and MP Mitch O’Farrell both stated that after they supported compulsory vaccination, they saw protesters conduct outside their homes in order to allow individuals to carry out some activities, such as eating in restaurants, Los Angeles Times report.
Martinez told the outlet that the protesters appeared outside her home around 7:30 in the evening. She said the protesters also disturbed her neighbors.
When the Democrats supported the destruction of Minneapolis, Kenosha, Portland, and other cities during the 2020 summer riot rave, what did Martin Luther King Jr. quote?
“In the final analysis, riots are unheard of language. What did the United States not hear?” pic.twitter.com/Als3jhxaGH
-Martin Luther King Jr. Center (@TheKingCenter) May 28, 2020
So maybe Congressman Martinez and O’Farrell should start listening to their voters? Just a suggestion.
Protesters showed up after gathering in a park in the city to express their dissatisfaction with the mandatory requirements for vaccines.
The gathering was held after members of the city council requested the drafting of a law that required individuals to present vaccination cards when attending events such as dining in restaurants.
The law is still in the drafting stage and no decision has yet been made.
“Whoever votes yes, we will come to your door,” a video on social media showed a man said during the protest. “Let’s come to your house. Do you want to scare us? We will come to you now.”
OK. Although I initially thought that protesting in front of public officials’ homes was an invasion of privacy, after protesting against these vaccine regulations, I believe I changed my mind. The intention of these officials is to destroy our peace and violate our privacy by establishing a discriminatory caste system and encouraging companies and individuals to withdraw and humiliate anyone who does not identify with their caste. The reason does not matter. There are many cases where people with weakened immune function or suffering from these experimental vaccines are likely to be sentenced to death. But this has nothing to do with these vaccine Nazis; they only pass a law under the guise of public safety and curse the consequences, whether intentional or unintentional.
They showed how indifferent they were during the pandemic, and it was an encouragement that people said they would not be fooled anymore.
If these elected members cannot understand this, then their peace should also be disturbed. Then, because of the laws that these elected officials chose to draft, their neighbors could name them and humiliate them because they broke their peace.
The door of the barn was opened by these elected “better men”; now the people in the barn can step on their lawn.
how are you feeling?
