Saturday, May 30, 2026

As liberals struggled to deal with it, the talking points of the Rittenhouse trial continued to emerge-RedState


Regarding the trial of Kyle Rittenhouse, yesterday was undoubtedly an interesting and newsworthy day. After several days of face changes by the prosecutor, Rittenhouse himself took a move that was both shocking and risky. RedState covers the result here, here, with hereTo be sure, the testimony provided and the actions of the prosecutor will now play an important role in the outcome.

But I want to start with the prediction I made yesterday morning before everything happened.

Soon after, things broke out, and the judge prosecuted many times for misconduct. This includes questioning Rittenhouse’s constitutional right to remain silent, and evidence that improper input has been ruled as unacceptable.

Sure enough, it didn’t take long before the topic came out. With Rittenhouse staring at a possible acquittal, the left needs a new scapegoat, and this judge, not a fanatical left-wing lunatic, is exactly what they are looking for.

Please note that these are not random accounts, but major news outlets.

This is a dangerous thing for two reasons. First, it placed the target directly on the back of a judge who did nothing but perform typical court procedures against a prosecutor who knew he had no case and had been waving frantically. Second, it establishes a narrative that Rittenhouse’s finding of “not guilty” was not a fair result to some extent.

When the latter happens, what will you get? You will get more violence and riots, and the media does not care that they are promoting this possible outcome through misleading reports.

We should also pay attention to the hypocrisy here. Whenever Donald Trump dared to make impromptu comments on any judicial process, The media ignited him As an improper interference in the court system.However, when the Democratic House leader Hakim Jeffries Announcing that Rittenhouse should be locked up And the key last night should be thrown away, the mainstream media did not criticize at all. Isn’t it weird? It’s almost as if the standards set by the media for Trump are really just plastic, partisan and convenient routes to promote political attacks.

But while people in the media attacked the judge based on the idea that he held a certain mythological prejudice (he was appointed by the Democratic Party), others continued the left-wing favorite drama: calling him a white supremacist.

The “judicial sanctity” that was introduced from 2016 to 2020 must soon disappear, right? Who knows that white people’s self-defense shooting of other white people is a manifestation of white supremacy?

What we are seeing are liberals who cannot cope with the reality that the facts do not support the results they hoped for. But instead of just admitting it, or at least just shutting up, they are now asking a teenager to be thrown into jail to prove their absurd worldview. The judge’s last-minute condemnation, based on anything tangible, was just another attempt to influence the trial, and the trial did not proceed in the way they thought it would.

In addition to the obvious meaning of this particular case (i.e. Rittenhouse’s imprisonment for his own defense), the broader problem is that it shows that there are no boundaries on one side of the political spectrum. They will literally seek to imprison those who they believe are contrary to their political views. The truth is damned. That is terrible.





Source link

Related articles

spot_imgspot_img