A cyber security media called The Record Reporting The National Security Agency said after investigating itself that they did not target or monitor Tucker Carlson.
Oh my goodness, I always feel relieved when government agencies conduct self-investigations.Especially considering the rough statement they made when the problem occurred It exploded last month.
It is not known whether the National Security Agency *specially* monitors Carlson, but this statement is worthless. First, it denies compound allegations of “surveillance” * and * showing off. Second, it says that he is not a “target”, which is an artistic term. The real danger is the so-called “accidental collection”. pic.twitter.com/xfKP5DGdML
— Justin Amash (@justinamash) June 30, 2021
Attorney Harmeet Dhillon resolved some of the issues in the statement.
If a cynical senior partner redefines your crisis management draft… pic.twitter.com/4vuISx58K0
— Harmeet K. Dhillon (@pnjaban) June 30, 2021
They admitted that at least according to this report, his name appeared in the discussion, and when some government officials requested it, his name was revealed.
Fox was very angry with this report.
“The NSA’s exposure of Tucker Carlson or any journalist trying to obtain newsworthy interviews is completely unacceptable, and it has seriously questioned their activities and their initial denials, which is very misleading. “A Fox News spokesperson told The Record.
The National Security Agency declined to comment.
Mark Steyn talked about this issue on Tucker Carlson’s show tonight.
The National Security Agency now admits that it “revealed” Tucker’s identity after an intelligence intercept. Also: Facebook’s tyrant confirmed that they have been censoring the show. pic.twitter.com/AeYbQzNWLI
-TuckerCarlson (@TuckerCarlson) July 24, 2021
Harmeet Dhillon, a guest, said that this explanation is inconsistent with the information Tucker has about what happened-the government is looking at Tucker’s information. In the acknowledgment of this NSA report, they are talking about a third party talking about him. In addition, Dhillon pointed out that only a few people have the right to lift the veil of people. As she pointed out, under the leadership of Barack Obama, when they lifted the veil of the people in the Trump team, this One right is “widely abused”.
“This raises more questions than answers,” Dhillon concluded. She also said that no American journalist should be subject to such surveillance. Finally, Dhillon condemned the NSA for leaking information about it to the media. First, the report did not explain. The National Security Agency has not yet explained how Axios communicates.
So it looks like the National Security Agency is trying to spin it without official comment to see if people will buy it. But as Dhillon said, this will only cause more problems. Why did they reveal his name? This has nothing to do with his news, so what? Is there any reason to leak it to the media. Hint: None, unless you try to hurt him in the media, which can be traced back to Tucker’s original point-doing it to hurt him.
