Monday, May 25, 2026

Oil, risks and price pressures ahead of Putin/Ukraine – using the Hamiltonian filter


Reader Erik Poole suggested using the Hamilton filter rather than the Hodrick-Prescott filter to assess the extent to which the CPI deviates from trend (recall that I noticed that the CPI rose 2% relative to trend as oil prices rose before and after Russia expanded its invasion of Ukraine). I am (very) happy to oblige.

figure 1: Oil price (Brent), $/bbl (blue, left scale) and CPI trend deviation (Hamilton filter) (tan, right scale). Dates of peak-to-trough recessions as defined by NBER are shaded in gray. Sources: EIA, BLS via FRED, NBER, and author’s calculations.

I implemented Hamiltonian filter h=24, p=12. From November 2011 to June 2022, the HP cyclical component is up 2.1%, while the Hamilton filter shows a gain of 7.7%.This matches my guess Overall, the estimated cyclical component is larger for most typical US macro series.

Clearly, correlation is not causation; in particular, a common factor associated with higher oil prices and higher aggregate demand would in itself (with a fixed or depressed aggregate supply) drive up prices. However, I think all will agree that at least a significant portion of the energy component of the CPI is related to cost-push inflationary pressures.



Source link

Related articles

Recession Watch: I agree with ZeroHedge

from Zero Hedge Given the long lag between recession...

Immigration, recovery and inflation | Economic Explorer

inside The Fed recently conducted a review of...

What is the household's debt situation?

CNN published an article today titled "What happened...

Confidence, news and sentiment in May

While the (ultimate) sentiment measured by the U-M...
spot_imgspot_img