Thursday, March 28, 2024
HomeElectionsSnopes editors don’t like facts, to save "USA Today"'s fact-checking report on...

Snopes editors don’t like facts, to save “USA Today”‘s fact-checking report on Biden – RedState


For fact-checkers, this has been a difficult week.

An embarrassed fact-checking reporter for “USA Today” was obsessed with a factually inaccurate entry for several days. He played the role of a victim-after correcting the story a little bit-and now he is defended by a Snopes editor who told us that the mistakes made by the USA TODAY fact checker show that we should be impressed by his work. Yes. ,seriously.

For a while, fact checking seemed to be one of the easiest jobs in journalism.Joe Biden’s arrival has been reported by the media Excited about the next 4 years of vacation, The affiliated departments of the media complex are only humiliating anyone who criticizes the president because they enhance his image.Glenn Kessler of the Washington Post even announced how He suspended Biden’s lie counter -Because it is not as important as Donald Trump.

But then Joe complicated things for them because he managed to complicate almost everything on a global scale. This week, Kessler provided a strong justification for Biden’s clumsy behavior in Afghanistan by simply repeating the talking points of the White House.Then we saw the indifference of this troupe because they refused to do some basic fact checks; Biden cited “millions” of women Will be refused abortion in Texas, Less than 55,000 people performed there last year, of course, Brian Stelter’s statement has not been corrected Fox News has no reporters in Kabul.

However, the biggest trouble occurred when Daniel Funke, the truth-detecting master of “USA Today” Tell the story of Joe Biden Offended the family of the killed Marine Corps from Kabul when he rudely checked his watch while the body returned to US territory. Viral videos of Biden’s actions circulated on social media, but Fink used the techniques that these experts liked to “correct” the story-he explained the facts.

The preliminary report has been announced Partial error Because of the very creative viewing. Funk concluded that, relying on a separate video, Biden was lightly portrayed, and Biden checked his watch once at the end of the ceremony. Now, most people would say that this actually confirmed the story, but since in Funke’s estimate, things are nearing an end, it doesn’t count… somehow.

In order to get this evaluation, Fink committed a major flaw. He ignored the impression of no less than four different members of the Venus family. They saw in detail that the president repeatedly checked his watch, which made them feel frustrated and angry. These testimonies appeared in various news media, including the Washington Post. finally, USA Today had to issue a correction, Rewrite the content with Fink.Despite this obvious mistake, they still tried to help Biden because the assessment was changed to not correct But to Lack of context.

As a result, Funke turned to social media and did not really defend his case, but instead condemned those who might object to his actions.

When we make a mistake, it is easy to dunk a reporter. I get it-for many people, we are just another name on the screen. But behind that screen is a man who strives to do his best.

Of course, Funke wrote an insult to the families of the fallen soldiers, but the person you responded to on Twitter was out of date—he was the real victim here. As you can see in the tweet above, Snopes editor Jordan Liles is helping him. However, this did not completely help things.

It almost feels absurd to explain this to someone like Jordan, but when we expect all journalists to provide facts, the mark of an outstanding journalist is to understand these facts correctly. This fully illustrates the problems of modern journalism. When they are accused of blatant mistakes and prejudice, they will feel indignant and demand that they be praised for the same mistakes.

If getting the facts right is the real goal of these people, they will be happy to be corrected and happily release accurate information. Instead, they exhibit offensive behavior when called up and become defensive when you ask for corrective measures.

This is a reaction, which occurs when they are not in order to correct records but to operate on the agenda. When they react in this way, it will be exposed-once the truth is presented to them and they are asked to actually do their job. It will tell you everything you need to know, and even fact checkers will get angry when they see the facts.





Source link

RELATED ARTICLES

Most Popular

Recent Comments