The mainstream media’s coverage of Kyle Rittenhouse’s trial is undoubtedly terrible and terrible. AskewAnd deliberately with prejudice – Even some liberals recognize The jury will begin its deliberations after hearing the testimony for two weeks.
Mainly because the prosecutors torpedo its case Against Rittenhouse, also because the trial judge Bruce Schroeder Admonish Suspicious tactics have been prosecuted many times. The mainstream media has made less subtle changes to question Schroeder’s character and impartiality, apparently trying to remove him from the trial, if not, at least convince people , If the verdict did not proceed in the way that the media/leftists hoped, then the way he handled the trial would be helpful.
Examples of this include absurd attack His “God Bless America” cell phone ringtone, heard during the defense speech last week, and another unfounded and absurd media drive attack One day last week, he made a comment on Schroeder, the comment may be the timetable for the arrival of Asian food ordered for him and the court members.He was joking about the supply chain crisis, but the media misunderstood Drew it As an “inappropriate Asian food joke”.
The latest media attack on Schroeder came from the Associated Press, which used a tried-and-tested “someone said” strategy (this time in the form of “some observers”) implying that Schroder performed well on the defensive end:
What is a fair trial? As the Kyle Rittenhouse trial unfolded, some observers were shocked by the judge’s apparent respect for the defendant.https://t.co/Zul1lNMaO6
— Associated Press (@AP) November 17, 2021
inside pieceThey did notice that most of what Schroeder did in this trial and most of what others did were fairly standard fees for judges who should actually respect the defense, because they proved that their case was a prosecution. Party’s work, not the defense’s work.
But the Associated Press also complained that the “optical” of some of the things that Schroder did in this trial caused “experts” (they magically found a few people) to question whether he had gone too far, such as when he had People applaud On Veterans Day, as a witness who happens to be a veteran’s defense.
Well, although I am not a lawyer, and certainly not a “legal expert”, I don’t need to understand why Schroeder shows respect for the defense, although since we are talking about “experts” I will quote one on Twitter. According to a lawyer, he responded accordingly:
“This is the view of #journalism. This is the view of the prosecutor-the structure of the criminal trial is purposefully beneficial to the defendant. Read all relevant content among 8th grade citizens,” Said Ohio lawyer Mark Weaver.
Another twitter user Likened to The Associated Press reported that news organizations are discussing how to report the “struggle meeting” of the trial. In fact, like many media outlets, they are struggling to have to reorganize the case because it has fallen apart for the prosecution.
Unfortunately, such oblique reports (some of them Schroeder complain Earlier today) will only fuel the fire of the militants, who are looking for any reason to burn the city if the trial is not conducted “in their way.” We can only hope and pray that what may happen in their city will not affect the jury’s consideration of the case, because if it does, the entire judicial system will collapse completely.
It is now more suitable than ever to pray for Kenosha.
related: This photo perfectly explains the stupidity of the main prosecution argument against Rittenhouse
