Tuesday, June 23, 2026

Rand Paul made a good point to YouTube after they suspended him from talking about COVID-19 – RedState


Kentucky Senator Rand Paul has been at the forefront Reveal the truth Behind all the red tape surrounding COVID-19 in Washington. To be sure, his work is shocking. In a fair world, the press will use the information he finds and spread it to every work screen and speaker across the United States.

but it is not the truth. On the contrary, the person who controls these screens will do their best to make her ignore him, mistakenly slander him, or censor him in the case of YouTube.

YouTube deleted several videos of Paul, and just last week, he had a conversation with a Newsmax reporter on several topics, including “the science behind the mask.” YouTube deleted the video and suspended his account for 7 days to post any content. As Paul said, YouTube’s reasoning is that he posted content that runs counter to the government’s narrative of COVID-19.

Some sources confirmed that Paul was a member of the government.

According to YouTube, Paul also uploaded another video titled “It’s now unfiltered news”, which also violated the Community Guidelines.

As he can no longer upload to YouTube, for the time being, Paul uploaded a now-deleted video on Rumble, which explained what happened between him and YouTube and why they deleted his video; talked about the science related to wearing a mask Research. Some of the narratives of the Democratic Party are inconvenient and must be cancelled.

This Daily Telegraph Paul made some comments on YouTube’s actions against him at a press conference earlier today:

“I am not sure when YouTube will become a government department, and I am not sure whether journalism will also become a government department without any influence or counterattack,” Senator Paul said.

Although some conservatives have called for various forms of legislative action to control large technology companies, Senator Paul discussed another method.

“My hope is that maybe through competition, we will prove that their approach is wrong,” he said.

Paul continues to point out that he is a free market idealist, and he believes that private companies should be able to suspend him from their platform if they wish, but please note that this is still an attack on freedom of speech:

“As a liberal senator, I think private companies have the right to ban me, but I think this is really anti-freedom of speech, anti-scientific progress, and involves suspicion and disputes to reach the truth,” Senator Paul said . “We are aware of this in our court system. Both parties have stated the facts on either side of the issue and completed the confrontation process to find the truth in each case.”

Senator Paul then linked the debate to the field of journalism.

“Journalism is not far from this. In some respects, the adversarial part of the court is journalism under ideal conditions. Both sides will state the facts. There is a period of debate and people find out the truth on their own,” he said. “However, YouTube and Google have become such a large entity that they consider themselves the arbiters of the truth.”

There are two points here.

First of all, as Paul pointed out, YouTube has become a government department, which shouldn’t be the same thing. Controlling the information of a party means only allowing propaganda to support one party, at least on certain topics. This no longer makes YouTube a platform, and no longer a publisher with platform characteristics.

Second, entities like YouTube and other large technology companies seem to want to promote the term “government”, but its definition of government is very dark. Paul was a government figure engaged in scientific research, and he was silenced. It seems that the only government entity that YouTube wants to promote is an entity it agrees to. If the Republicans miraculously occupy the White House, House of Representatives, and Senate tomorrow, as the government begins to inject real science into the dialogue, it is highly questionable whether YouTube will adjust its position.

Did not insist on “government”. First of all there should not be. This is an insistence on “ideology.”



Source link

Related articles

spot_imgspot_img