Thursday, May 30, 2024
HomeElectionsThe harvest of the function research debate-RedState

The harvest of the function research debate-RedState

ChiCom explored and confirmed the lie about the origin of the “COVID-19” virus in the previous article Here. That article puts forward an “either-or” scenario for its release: either it was an accidental leak in the laboratory, or it was deliberately designed and released through functional acquisition research (possibly by the People’s Liberation Army, Wuhan Institute of Virus Control – WIV). This February 2020 article is from the UK Daily mail Gives us a hint about its origin and purpose, and also labeled it as a “conspiracy theory” at the time:

China According to reports, after the outbreak of the novel coronavirus, its top military biological weapons experts have been appointed to take over a secret virus laboratory in Wuhan. coronavirus, Triggered a conspiracy theory that the health crisis may be related to the military.

After months of revelation led many to conclude that the laboratory leak theory of engineered viruses is the only credible theory of its origin, what does this “conspiracy theory” look like now?

Shi Zheng-li, Communist China’s “Batgirl“For more than a year, news about the origin of the ChiCom virus has been appearing frequently in the news. ChiComs has been frantically promoting the theory of zoonotic diseases while keeping her secret until she Was dragged out three weeks ago to “categorically deny” It is speculated that her laboratory at WIV was the source of the virus, as if her denial would somehow overcome the revelation of the origin of the virus by several researchers before her dramatic announcement in the ChiCom-friendly report New York Times.

For example, two famous people believe that the CGG-CGG amino acid sequence found in ChiCom virus is man-made and can only be inserted through functional research, as they detailed in a column. Wall Street Journal, Because the CGG-CGG sequence is not found in This is what the Salk Institute says Regarding the role of those spike proteins in the human body. Salk researchers and collaborators showed how this protein damages cells, confirming that COVID-19 is a major vascular disease. And British professor Angus Dalgleish and Norwegian scientist Dr. Birger Sørensen completed a study, “Claims that Chinese scientists created COVID-19 in the Wuhan laboratory,” And they have evidence of China’s “reverse engineering” for more than a year. They are still waiting for the “Bat Girl” to explain!

For more information about Shi Zhengli’s career in virus research and management at WIV since 2005, please read This excellent article From the Epoch Times. There is no doubt that she is the center of WIV gain-of-function research.

As in This 2016 report From the National Center for Biotechnology Information of the National Institutes of Health, “Gain-of-function (GoF) research involves experiments that are designed or expected (and/or actually do) to increase the infectivity and/or virulence of pathogens.” Regarding whether the GoF study Is ethical and whether the U.S.— Fully understand Dr. Anthony Fauci And others-participated in helping fund this research, first in the U.S. and then finally in WIV.Oops, even ol’ Hunter Biden’s company started funding a company that worked with WIV because Report here:

Rosemont Seneca Technology Partners, an investment company led by Hunter Biden, is the main financial backer of Metabiota, an epidemic tracking and response company that cooperates with Peter Daszak’s Eco-Health Alliance and Wuhan Institute of Virology.

People want to know how much the hologram knows about WIV, and when did he first know about it?

How long has the GoF research been conducted at WIV? The U.S. State Department in a report entitled “Activities of Wuhan Institute of Virology,” This was masked by traditional media in January 2021 (emphasis added):

  1. WIV research:

  • Beginning at least in 2016 — and there is no sign of stopping before the COVID-19 outbreak — WIV researchers have conducted experiments involving RaTG13, which was identified by WIV in January 2020 as the closest to SARS-CoV-2 (96.2% similar). After the SARS outbreak in 2003, WIV became the focus of international coronavirus research. Since then, animals including rats, bats and pangolins have been studied.
  • WIV has a published record of conducting a “gain of function” study to design a chimeric virusHowever, WIV’s record of studying the viruses most similar to the COVID-19 virus is not transparent or consistent, including “RaTG13”, which came from a cave in Yunnan Province in 2013 after several miners died of SARS-like diseases. Medium sampling.
  • Before the COVID-19 outbreak, WHO investigators must have access to WIV’s work records on bats and other coronaviruses. As part of a thorough investigation, they must fully explain why WIV changed and deleted its online record of using RaTG13 and other viruses.
  1. Secret military activities of WIV:
  • Confidentiality and non-disclosure are standard practices in Beijing. For many years, the United States has publicly expressed concern about China’s past biological weapons work. Although Beijing has undertaken clear obligations under the Biological Weapons Convention, it has neither recorded nor clearly eliminated it.

  • Although WIV presents itself as a private institution, The United States has determined that WIV has cooperated with the Chinese military on publications and secret projects.Since at least 2017, WIV has conducted classified research including laboratory animal experiments on behalf of the Chinese military.

  • The United States and other donors who are funding or cooperating with WIV for civilian research have the right and obligation to determine whether any of our research funds are transferred to WIV’s secret Chinese military projects.

Let’s review:

  • More and more independent reports link the virus outbreak to WIV.
  • The first known case of the virus occurred in Wuhan, Hubei Province (probably as early as November 2019, if not earlier).
  • The number of years WIV has conducted the GoF study is unknown.
  • According to the US State Department, the PLA controls WIV and conducts secret research projects there, at least since 2017 Testified in the House of Representatives China Working Group last week.
  • The virus is man-made and contains protein sequences not found in nature.
  • ChiComs has used the virus Economic and political gains.

It is not an exaggeration to conclude from the above points that ChiComs has been engaged in biological warfare with the man-made COVID-19 virus.

But is this the first time?

Check out this excerpt from this titled research paper, The re-emerged 1977 H1N1 strain and the gain-of-function debate, Published by the American Society for Microbiology in August 2015 (emphasis added):

The 1977-1978 influenza pandemic may not be a natural event, because the gene sequence of the virus is almost the same as the sequence of the strain decades agoAlthough there are several hypotheses that can explain its origin, in recent discussions on the biosafety risks of acquired-function (GOF) influenza virus research, the possibility that the 1977 pandemic was caused by laboratory accidents has become increasingly popular As an argument for the reason, this research should not be conducted. The United States is now suspending funding for GOF research while analyzing the benefits and risks, including the possibility of accidents. Given the importance of this historic epidemic to the ongoing policy debate, we re-examined the evidence that the 1977 epidemic was not a natural epidemic and examined three potential origins: laboratory accidents, escape from live vaccine trials, or deliberate Released as a biological weapon. According to the available evidence, the strain from 1977 does match too much with strains from decades ago and cannot be a natural occurrence.. Although the origin of the epidemic cannot be finalized without additional evidence, There is a very reasonable alternative to the laboratory accident hypothesis, Reducing the relevance of the experience of 1977 to the modern GOF debate.

Yes, of course there are “very reasonable alternatives to the laboratory accident hypothesis”, one of which is the purposeful release as a biological warfare test. What about the man-made version of COVID-19? ChiComs has certainly learned a lot by observing the United States and other countries over the past 18 months in response to the fear campaign helped and instigated by ChiCom’s official media to stifle their economies. Are the charges of biological warfare testing “excessive”? I don’t think so. Consider this report:

According to Australia Weekend, a document written by Chinese scientists and Chinese public health officials in 2015 discussed the weaponization of the SARS coronavirus.

title The unnatural origin of SARS and a new species of artificial virus as a genetic biological weapon, The paper predicts that the Third World War will be carried out with biological weapons.

Published five years before the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, it described the SARS coronavirus as a “new era of genetic weapons”, which can be “manipulated into an emerging human disease virus, and then weaponized in an unprecedented way. freed” .

in conclusion. ChiComs almost certainly did it before, and they did it again. They have discussed this in their scientific journals. The US government confirmed that they have been conducting functional gain research for many years. Considering what has happened in the United States and around the world in the past 18 months, do we think that ChiCom’s altruism is behind their gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology-or is it involved in darker and more evil things? It has been a long time since I woke up to reality.

the end.

Source link


Most Popular

Recent Comments